Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

2008 US Legacy and Outback Model Lineup


Jon in CT

Recommended Posts

At the auto show it looked like the 3.0R had a redline of 6500, but the tachometer went up to 9000. Anybody have any ideas if that engine can be pushed to 8 or 8.5K without having to do a rebuild?

 

NFW.

 

I'd be surprised if that valves don't float by 7000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looking at the pictures again, I really like the redish wood instead of the brushed alluminum. It looks very rich. I hope not to be dissapointed when I see it in person.

 

I really don't want to see the 3.0L in the Legacy Ive decided. Its old news now that the 3.6L has debuted. And its obselete in my oppinion. A performance company that wants to gain status, but offers a boring 3.0L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when 250HP 3.0L engine is boring?

If you want more excitement you buy 2.5L with turbo.

 

You guys understand that 3.6L in Legacy would be US only adventure for Subaru just like VW Passat 3.6 is for VW.

 

Krzys

 

PS I think Passat R36 will be offered in Europe too but it will be very low percentage of total sold, I bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when 250HP 3.0L engine is boring?

 

Since Toyota started offering the Camry with a 3.5L 268 hp engine. Not to mention that the 3.0L doesnt have all that much torque. And the 3.0L doesnt have any better fuel economy than the 2.5L turbo, so whats the point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Toyota started offering the Camry with a 3.5L 268 hp engine. Not to mention that the 3.0L doesnt have all that much torque. And the 3.0L doesnt have any better fuel economy than the 2.5L turbo, so whats the point?

 

Yes, a Camry is very exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, a Camry is very exciting.

 

I didnt say that it was. But, Americans look at horsepower. Although a Camry may be slower from 0 - 60, people can still look at it go "hmmm more horsepower and better fuel economy than the competition."

 

What is the 0 - 60 of an H6 Outback anyway? Anyone?

The 0 - 60 of a Camry V6?

 

Im not sure that the Outback/3.0R would beat a Camry V6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Toyota started offering the Camry with a 3.5L 268 hp engine. Not to mention that the 3.0L doesnt have all that much torque. And the 3.0L doesnt have any better fuel economy than the 2.5L turbo, so whats the point?

 

I think it is the idea that there is a directiional move behind it. If they start offering a 6 cylinder then they might offer a turbo 6 cylinder. And that would be cool. I think it is safe to say that the 2.5L boxer engine has reached it's capacity in terms of imagination and aftermarket parts. I mean for gods sake there are people with turbos and superchargers on the thing. It is really maxed out. While there may be many technical advantages to a 4 cylinder the six cylinder is a better move in terms of the numbers game for subaru. When stupid americans buy cars they see HP and more cylinders as equal to performance. While we all know this is an assanine notion, this is the education level of the consumers. The legacy is hands down one of the fastest sedans in the market, but people see 4 cylinder and think slow boring Japanese sedan with so-so appearance and less brand recognition than a toyota. If the people ask for old moldy cheese, you give it to them with a fancy french name and jack up the price. Now, where this is advantageous to us is when Subaru sticks to it's guns about performance. IF they take the 6 cylinder and make it their new engine platform it will give us a reliable 6 cylinder boxer engine with endless capabilities for mods, larger displacement and a chance at more top end power. Think Porsche, or no longer losing the 60-100 race with all the european sport cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cars101.com/subaru/outback/Ob08keys1.JPG

 

Ok.. who are all the idiots who complained about having a seperate remote from the key? This is what we get thanks to you and I wouldn't want to have to carry that big ugly thing on my key ring.

 

Booooooo

 

It looks like my sisters ugly accord key :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Booo.... Ugly huge awkward key. (good idea, but FAR too big. Subaru just can't hit the mark lately, can they?)

 

Hooray.... ummmm....

 

 

...Beer?!

 

haha! Man they need some help. I just don't think that it would be that hard. They should just hire some of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cars101.com/subaru/outback/Ob08keys1.JPG

 

Ok.. who are all the idiots who complained about having a seperate remote from the key? This is what we get thanks to you and I wouldn't want to have to carry that big ugly thing on my key ring.

 

Oh, idea is great (check VW integrated key http://i9.ebayimg.com/06/i/08/e0/c4/af_1_b.JPG) just execution lacks.

 

Krzys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have you guys ever seen integrated keys before? they are all huge

 

nah. my key is barely larger than the Subaru key was.

 

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y124/PatagonianGT/webpics/mini_cooper_key_remote_thumb.jpgG]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use