JDM SpecB Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 BigTDogg (MA): Ive added the AFR column to the next column update. Ill push it out in a few minutes and you should start seeing AFR next time you let VD update by being connected to the internet when you start it up. Let me know if you need anything else. Did you add the other model data? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 *gulp* .... what other model data? Ill be glad to add it if I haven't already. Just make me aware of which model I need to add. I get so many emails and requests its almost overwhelming for one person (well with my brain anyway) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 oh just the one I added earlier in the thread. You were already aware of it so youve probably done it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 Is it showing up in the list? Ive released all the ones Ive added so far. If its not in the list its not added yet. Let me know and Ill get it added if its not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 26, 2011 Author Share Posted September 26, 2011 1.1.3 released. Should fix the permission issues people have been having and a few other issues. I added a few small features. Hope everyone likes it, just start up Virtual Dyno and it should update itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 26, 2011 Author Share Posted September 26, 2011 1.1.4 released to fix a major bug in the time converter code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 So new version of Virtual dyno with the JDM 2.0 data also Im struggling to find correct info if the final gear is in fact 4.444 for the JDM 5EAT. Any help here would be good. UPDATE: Final drive 3.583 Brad can you please update Also can you edit it so the model says 2003-2006 Legacy Wagon 2.0 GT [Auto] http://i52.tinypic.com/8vsuag.jpg Interesting how Green and Yellow ,which is the same log but different settings i.e 2.0GT Vs 2.5GT settings plots the same line? http://i52.tinypic.com/34rdq1g.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 Ill be more than glad to update it if you clarify if what you are describing is another model and I need to add a new model or if I need to correct the Legacy Wagon 2003-2006 to a 2.0L with a 3.583 final drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 UPDATE: Final drive 3.583 Brad can you please update Also can you edit it so the model says 2003-2006 Legacy Wagon 2.0 GT [Auto] http://i52.tinypic.com/8vsuag.jpg Ill be more than glad to update it if you clarify if what you are describing is another model and I need to add a new model or if I need to correct the Legacy Wagon 2003-2006 to a 2.0L with a 3.583 final drive. Yes please ,can you update the existing model you recently added so it has 2.0 GT added to the model description like the other variants do, otherwise it looks like it might be a non turbo car. The final drive data needs updating to the correct 3.583. Thanks:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 I searched online and found 4.444 for the final drive ratio ... something is funky here. Do I have the data in there for another model? Should I leave this model there and add another one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 I modified the current entry. If someone complains Ill fix it I guess when that happens. Enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fahr_side Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 My '08 EDM WRX has 4.444:1 final drive. US models often have higher ratios than RotW units... Obligatory '[URL="http://legacygt.com/forums/showthread.php/2008-gh8-238668.html?t=238668"]build thread[/URL]' Increased capacity to 2.7 liters, still turbo, but no longer need spark plugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 2.0 GT 5AT gear ratios. 1. 3.540 2. 2.264 3. 1.471 4. 1.000 5. 0.834 Final drive 3.583 I searched online and found 4.444 for the final drive ratio ... something is funky here. Do I have the data in there for another model? Should I leave this model there and add another one? Can you link to what you found? It was prob info on the MT ? My WOT runs I sent to the tuner look pretty ordinary now :-( http://i52.tinypic.com/m74xt1.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 27, 2011 Author Share Posted September 27, 2011 Those are the gear ratios that I have in there for the automatic transmission. The manual transmission info is: <TransGear3>1.521</TransGear3> <TransGear4>1.137</TransGear4> <FinalGearRatio>3.900</FinalGearRatio> Are these numbers not correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Well i was given Final drive 3.583 from someone who said it was from the local subaru brochure back then. Who knows, its a nightmare trying to get the official info. My curves above seem to low though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 28, 2011 Author Share Posted September 28, 2011 Ok ... Im confused do you have a Legacy Wagon 2.0 GT Spec.B because I see they made: Legacy Wagon 2.0G Spec.B and Legacy Wagon 2.0 GT Which one of those do you have? Anyone else want to chime in here as Im pretty darn confused at this moment why subaru had to make so many models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 SpecB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted September 28, 2011 Author Share Posted September 28, 2011 I have these in the definitions. Tell me which ones to modify. <CarMake>Subaru</CarMake> <CarModel>Legacy</CarModel> <CarSubModel>2.5 GT Wagon</CarSubModel> <StartYear>2005</StartYear> <EndYear>2007</EndYear> <Weight>3435</Weight> <TransTypeManual>true</TransTypeManual> <TransGear3>1.296</TransGear3> <TransGear4>0.972</TransGear4> <FinalGearRatio>4.111</FinalGearRatio> <DragCoefficient>0.31</DragCoefficient> <FrontalArea>22.56</FrontalArea> <TireDiameter>24.62</TireDiameter> <CarMake>Subaru</CarMake> <CarModel>Legacy</CarModel> <CarSubModel>Wagon 2.0 GT spec.B</CarSubModel> <StartYear>2003</StartYear> <EndYear>2006</EndYear> <Weight>3351</Weight> <TransTypeManual>false</TransTypeManual> <TransGear3>1.471</TransGear3> <TransGear4>1.000</TransGear4> <FinalGearRatio>3.583</FinalGearRatio> <DragCoefficient>0.32</DragCoefficient> <FrontalArea>22.20</FrontalArea> <TireDiameter>25.07</TireDiameter> <CarMake>Subaru</CarMake> <CarModel>Legacy</CarModel> <CarSubModel>Wagon 2.0 GT spec.B</CarSubModel> <StartYear>2003</StartYear> <EndYear>2006</EndYear> <Weight>3351</Weight> <TransTypeManual>true</TransTypeManual> <TransGear3>1.521</TransGear3> <TransGear4>1.137</TransGear4> <FinalGearRatio>3.900</FinalGearRatio> <DragCoefficient>0.32</DragCoefficient> <FrontalArea>22.20</FrontalArea> <TireDiameter>25.07</TireDiameter> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDM SpecB Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 Looks like it should be 3.272 according to the official subaru doc http://i52.tinypic.com/2m3jmv7.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Donated thefultonhow Posted October 3, 2011 I Donated Share Posted October 3, 2011 What's the best way to get a pull that has an accurate curve? Flat and straight? Because I don't think that kind of road exists around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbarnhill Posted October 3, 2011 Author Share Posted October 3, 2011 See that document doesnt show the manual 2.0 either ... sigh ... Im confused even more now. None of these documents that I have found have the same numbers in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTDogg MA Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 What's the best way to get a pull that has an accurate curve? Flat and straight? Because I don't think that kind of road exists around here. I use a long straight on ramp, because I've caught shit the last time I did it in a school zone in the rain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNVAR Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 He has a 5MT, he could just do his pull in 3rd. That's what I did for my Infamous tune. He has you doing pulls in 4? 4th in the 5MT to redline would take me past 120 MPH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Donated thefultonhow Posted October 7, 2011 I Donated Share Posted October 7, 2011 He has a 5MT, he could just do his pull in 3rd. That's what I did for my Infamous tune. He has you doing pulls in 4? 4th in the 5MT to redline would take me past 120 MPH. I think the joke is that I would be going like 110 mph in a school zone. In other news, what's up with the green line? http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a325/thefultonhow/Subaru/virtualdyno1.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNVAR Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 It happens. Mild variations in the road surface, different slopes of the road, and all of that jazz. What'd you make the log with, RR? Was fast polling on? If yes and yes, then turn up the smoothing option a bit. Fast polling provides enough resolution that you can crank up the smoothing and still remain quite accurate. He was joking? Oh... I thought he was serious. N/M then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.