mikeyan Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 the EVO IX SE? crap, now i can't remember the color SoCal Duck Hunters Club - Unit 52 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOXRPWR Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 yeah. I'm not holding my breath for going ahead of the Nissan/Infiniti Accessport. Chris said something like, "the Mazdaspeed AP will be out before winter, surely it won't be 2008." I bet that I'll have to remind him of that when Christmas time comes and I still can't buy the one toy that I really want bad!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted July 22, 2007 Author Share Posted July 22, 2007 Kevin, your car is a lightweight:eek:, but with bad-ass power. Anthony and Paul told me that my car was probably right in line with HM's dynojet, but with the boost/tune i'm running, the 100+ temps caused my car to dyno lower(cause of the ecu pulling timing across the board?). Correct me if i'm wrong tho, Paul. I believe the general consensus is... the Legacy 5EAT blows on the dyno, and my tune/block are doing okay 3+ months since my protune . I'll try to bring some next track numbers in a week or so. Mike I saw a fair amount of activity on your knock light on the first pull, and it looked like the ECU pulled timing on subsequent pulls from both the shape of your curves and also the fact that I never saw any more flashes from the knock light. Also, unless the temperature compensation table was modified when you were tuned, IAT readings above 40*C or 104*F will result in 5*+ of timing being pulled from your map. 104*F IAT are pretty easy to find when it was 102*F ambient and your MAF is housed in a metal tube inside your hot engine bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyan Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 right on, thanks for the explanation paul ghetto heat wrap can only go so far, and it was getting damn hot in there. Thanks again for running the dyno. SoCal Duck Hunters Club - Unit 52 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaLaleh Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Are you guys talking about Chris's Blue Evo? SubaruBoxer.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rommel Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 I'm also waiting for Cobb to release the AP for the '07 Foresters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rommel Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 I think they were talking about the light colored EVO that came in around noon time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOXRPWR Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 would it be possible to post up here the stock EVO dyno plot? did any other stock cars run on the dyno? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted July 22, 2007 Author Share Posted July 22, 2007 would it be possible to post up here the stock EVO dyno plot? did any other stock cars run on the dyno? I'll check on posting up stock STi and Evo graphs on Monday. The second Evo was the only stock car to run yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rommel Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Don't post the 3.0R's number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOXRPWR Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 I'll check on posting up stock STi and Evo graphs on Monday. The second Evo was the only stock car to run yesterday. thanks Paul. and you mean only the 2nd stock car to run yesterday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOXRPWR Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Don't post the 3.0R's number. yeah. that will kill future sales of the 3.0R. I don't understand why Subaru would go through all the development and production of the new 3.6L H6 for the '08 Tribeca and not simultaneously put it into a Legacy 3.6R. look at all the competitive 3.5L NA V-6's out there (Toyota, Nissan, heck even Hyundai). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted July 22, 2007 Author Share Posted July 22, 2007 That 3.0 H6 is a pure waste of time. Yes, it's smooth but I cannot see any reason to pick it over the 2.5 GT motor. For fun I overlayed the H6 graph over a Stage 2 LGT graph and the LGT made more power EVERYWHERE and at the torque peak of the turbo motor it made 150 ft/lbs more torque. Horsepower wise, the tuned LGT made 100 whp more. No brainer to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted July 22, 2007 Author Share Posted July 22, 2007 As for comparable motors, I recall a G35 sedan with an automatic running on the Yimi dyno and I think it made something like 220-225whp with just a catback. The H6 needs to make at least 210+ whp to make any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiniStiGuy Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 the EVO is my roomates evo.... he put down 240+ and he is stock... when I get home today I'll try and see if his scanner works and I'll scan up his chart for you Kev. OEM HID's Rx330 Retro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiniStiGuy Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 my LGT is just stage 1 with a catback and I put down 230/240 so we'll see how it is once I go stg 2 I'm expecting 250/270's OEM HID's Rx330 Retro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOXRPWR Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 ^^^^^^ that would be cool. sorry to be monopolizing this Subie thread with chat about my Speed3 (but I know you guys are way cool about it anyways.) I've been thinking about why/where I gained a good deal of power since I first dyno'd it on a Dynojet down in San Diego when it was about a month old and bone stock. here's that dyno plot: http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/BOXRPWR/DynoKevMS3-1.jpg the only engine related mods since then are the bigger TMIC which shouldn't really add a thing power-wise except better heat soak resistance on the street/track (which it most surely does!), and I put in a K&N drop-in panel filter in the stock air box. Now I do run the car with about a 50:50 mix of 91 gas and 100 octane race gas but only at the track. I fill up with 100 gas at the track station. I ran at Buttonwillow exactly two weeks ago. Yet I've run at least 3 full tanks of gas since on pump 91. So any ECU learning should be back to normal. The other factor is that I do run my Speed3 aggressively fairly often. And I've been to the track 3 times inside of the past 2 months. I also turned over 16k miles on the odometer driving up to Yimi so the engine is well broken-in now compared to that first dyno when it was still young. Who knows??? Clearly something has gotten better because there are way too many comparisons from yesterday's dyno runs to call it a fluke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaLaleh Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Don't post the 3.0R's number. SubaruBoxer.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProjectS15 Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 POST THEM!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiniStiGuy Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 I think the dyno was accurate Kev. I didn't even know what a stg 1 would put down but I figured 230hp and around the same Torque. I was right on the money so I think that Yimi's dyno is calibrated correct. Mind we were doing these in 100º temps aswell. OEM HID's Rx330 Retro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiniStiGuy Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 ohhh my roomate threw away his scanner because he says it was broken. His number's on a stock EVO IX were 252/242. OEM HID's Rx330 Retro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPTTuning Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 That was a fun day, it was great to meet everyone. Sorry I couldn't stay longer to see some of those good runs! Overall I'm fairly satisfied with the numbers I put down. After I get the Header on next week I'll finalize the tune with some more fuel and get it back on the dyno to see if I can break 260 on the TD04 with 91. http://www.xpttuning.com/osecuroms/uploads/scan0001_439.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisF Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 XPTTuning: Can you answer a question for me? I'm assuming your car is running a 91 octane map. If so, are you running greater than 12.0:1 AFR's? Isn't that a bit on the lean side for a street tune? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanger Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 i had a great time somebody post some pictures!!! ○ ○ ○ Instagram: itshangertime :spin: ○ ○ ○ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MannyLegacy Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 ^^^ Yeah, I wanna see some pics guys!! Or at least a link to some pics. :munch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.