mattg Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 Looks proper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rester5350 Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 The S2 is a 272 duration cam. The lift is like 10.8 for the intake and 10.4 for the exhaust. I read that thread when I was researching cams. I almost got BC cams because I was afraid of the GSCs failing. But, my builder recommended GSC cams as did another builder when I was doing research. I've got 200 miles so far. Hopefully I won't have any issues. Here's a vid of a how they sound with the cutout open. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6SbFjY4yXI That sound is the sex!!! I am going to be using the Kelford 272s which seem to be issue free. When I first started ready that tread, I almost shat my pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th3Franz Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 I'm running GSC S1 cams with no issues, 2500 miles now. What made you choose BC valve springs? -Franz The end of a Legacy http://www.youtube.com/th3franz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted February 16, 2014 Author Share Posted February 16, 2014 I'm running GSC S1 cams with no issues, 2500 miles now. What made you choose BC valve springs? Good to hear you haven't had any issues. Makes me relax a little bit. I went with BC because they were cheaper and I didn't need the spring rate of the GSC beehives or other higher rate valve springs. I checked with GSC and they said they'd work fine for what I was doing. So I've been out tuning and got this thing to put down a corrected 530 using the Mustang dyno setting on VD. If I use the Dynojet setting, it puts it over 600. I definitely think it has an 11 at over 120 in it. Launching at 5000 RPMs it went 0-120 in 10 seconds. I don't think that's too bad for a full weight Legacy at 4200'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 Results are in. Did 3 pulls. The first pull was in 4th gear and the other two in 3rd. Made 521, 517, 517, corrected of course. Here's a vid of the second pull. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoMhQThDZys]Subaru Legacy spec. B rotated GTX3576r 517 whp Mustang dyno - YouTube[/ame] I'll post up the graphs once I have them. It was really neat overlaying the graphs between the current setup and the stock motor, stock location setup from the first post of this thread. Only lost a few hundred RPM in spool up, but made tons more up top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strizzy Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Subscribed for time slips. It looks like I may have a worth contender for fastest LGT in the 1/4 My bad luck build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted February 26, 2014 Author Share Posted February 26, 2014 Nothing like a little friendly competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drogos Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 f' me......NICE numbers. What do you expect from stock (?) axles at these power levels and when they go - what are you planning to put in, sorry if that was discussed already? Also did you check tranny/diff. fluids? I am especially curious how stock r. diff will hold that kind of torque. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted February 27, 2014 Author Share Posted February 27, 2014 I'm not sure how well the stock axles hold up. If they break I'll just use stock ones again. I don't plan on using a drag radial, so the tires will take most of the abuse. I'm definitely going to be traction limited. From what I've seen the trans and rear end are pretty stout. One of the advantages of a spec b. Here's the 4th gear dyno graph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakeforslund Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Great numbers. I am impressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th3Franz Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Nice curve. Stock lgt intake manifold may be holding you back on the top end. -Franz The end of a Legacy http://www.youtube.com/th3franz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattg Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Beastly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 8, 2014 Author Share Posted March 8, 2014 Thanks guys. Yeah power definitely takes a nose dive up top. I still have the stock ports on the heads too. I was a under timed on the top end and that didn't help with keeping the power going. I've since added 5 degrees of timing up top and it pulls better to 7500, but it's still choked. I also got a little crazy. I found a good deal on a hta3582r. Should be good for a few more ponies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTTuner Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 You have to get this car down the 1320', the last half of the track is gonna be a blurr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Yeah man, I can't wait to get some time slips. I am a little nervous though. Altitude is a nasty whore and many hearts have been broken at our track. Hope for the best but prepare for the worst I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DOHCstunr Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Here's the boost graph from the 20g. I use an MBC and that's with no change to it at all. I used speed density with a cutout on the last car I built. The only way to do it is how you describe; lower boost with cutout closed, higher boost with cutout open. I used a switch that ran both the cutout controller and a solenoid in my wastegate vacuum line. With the cutout closed it would run wastegate boost and I could adjust the VE table at the lower MAP accordingly. Flip the switch and it opened the cutout and solenoid resulting in higher boost where I had the higher MAP VE set accordingly. So you're probably thinking, "Why the hell aren't you doing that now?" Number one, the engine management I used allowed for map switching. By grounding a pin in the ECU you could switch between two different timing and fuel maps. I used the switch that controlled the cutout and boost to control the different ECU maps and arm the meth system. So, switch down = low boost, cutout closed, no meth, pump gas timing and fuel maps. Switch up = high boost, meth armed, cutout opened, meth timing and fuel maps. It worked well and was a lot of fun. If I could rig something up like that on my Legacy I'd love to, but, honestly, I haven't researched all my options to go down that road. Do '07's not have SI drive? Seems you could have a tune on sport with cutout closed and sport# with cutout open, and if you aren't using your tgv motors or EBC then maybe have your tuner have the sport sharp switch open an electronic cutout. Or perhaps some other 12v switched unused output. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Yeah my car has SI drive. That would actually work really well. Using sport sharp to activate relays to open the cutout and arm the meth system. Then I could use the requested torque tables to have high/low boost. I might have to look into getting that to work. Then I could go full speed density and ditch the 3.5" maf housing. It would be really cool to have SI drive switch between cruise/non-cruise timing maps. This would allow for map switching. Could use the open loop fuel/failsafe fuel maps to alternate fuel as well. Onboard pump/meth map switching on the fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 16, 2014 Author Share Posted March 16, 2014 So the turbo I ended up getting isn't an HTA3582r. The pictures just looked like one. It is a custom build by Turbos Direct in Glendale, AZ. It falls between an HTA3582r and a HTA3586r. It technically would be considered a 3584r. It has a 7-blade billet compressor with a 60mm inducer and 84mm exducer with extended tips. The tips are 88mm. It's laggier, but it pulls damn hard. 70-90mph in 1.48 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strizzy Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Can you take a video of your speedo going 50-100? My bad luck build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 16, 2014 Author Share Posted March 16, 2014 Funny you should ask. I did this last night. I wanted to see how the tune looked for a drag strip pass. I tried FFS into 2nd, but the trans locked me out. Datalog showed: 50-100 - 4.22 60-130 - 7.69 100-200 km/h - 6.28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-q76rVuyU0&feature=youtu.be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cww Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 ^goddamn dude! that's wild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERLoft Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Holy balls. 2013 █S4 - Glacier White - DSG - B&O - Tech Package - Sports Diff - Napa - RS4 Grille - Stasis Exhaust - APR Intake - KW Variant 1 - Stern Control Arms - CR-15 - Stasis RSB - Moog Endlinks - PC Hyper Black Peelers - Deval Front Lip - ECS Rear Diffuser - Carbon Imports Ducktail - ECS Mirror Caps - Relak Paddle Extensions - Autostyle Floor Mats - LED Interior - V1 - Blackvue DR900s - [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody480 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 That's what i need in my life Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonspecB Posted March 29, 2014 Author Share Posted March 29, 2014 I was out messing around last night and decided to see how quick I could get a 60-130 time. I got it down to one shift by brake boosting 3rd and taking 4th out to 130. Datalog showed 6.88 seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6p9Py3aU6Q Virtual Dyno has been giving me some weird results (like 600 whp Mustang dyno uncorrected,) so I started using an older program I used years ago. The numbers are uncorrected with a 0.98 correction factor to simulate a Mustang dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s2baru Posted March 29, 2014 Share Posted March 29, 2014 Holy amazeballz. Ziptie is throwing it down! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.