Ricardo Posted March 15, 2005 Author Share Posted March 15, 2005 Well, there you go. This is the proof you all wanted. From now On, i will not post any more information on this forum. Too bad, I actually had alot of info you guys might of wanted to know. Will be a pleasure reading though. Like I said before, if you can't share without being discredited... then keep it to yourself. take a look, and try not to choke when you cry, benny. ( oh yeah, and TBD, for those of you who don't know means to be determined. ) http://img228.exs.cx/img228/9947/forester06verso8bx.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sduford Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Don't take it personally. A lot of people post rumours from "reliable sources" that almost always turn out to be total crap. Dealer sales people usually being amongst the most unreliable. So until you've established your credibility, the normal reaction is to dismiss all rumours about future models. Sylvain www.digitalfotographer.com - Audi Q5 Club - MB-GLK Club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt_ltd Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 hey at least I believe you! ken, you have watched too much tv/movies. This Space For Rent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted March 15, 2005 Author Share Posted March 15, 2005 I mean, this should be enough, no ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sduford Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I mean, this should be enough, no ? I sure hope so! Sylvain www.digitalfotographer.com - Audi Q5 Club - MB-GLK Club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PGT Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I mean, this should be enough, no ? Does it? Maybe I missed the point of the argument with all the names being thrown back and forth. I thought the issue was 6sp and 2.5L for the WRX. This pic shows a Forrester with a 5sp. What did I miss that you made so clear for us? (scratching my head) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precise Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 From now On, i will not post any more information on this forum. Too bad, I actually had alot of info you guys might of wanted to know. Will be a pleasure reading though. Like I said before, if you can't share without being discredited... then keep it to yourself. I think regardless of where you go there will be skeptics and people that call you out. You can choose to ignore them or let them affect you. In the end if you're right about it, then more propz to you. Just wanted to let you know that some people do value whatever input you give. -precise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praedet Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Actually he is showing that the SOHC engines will have VVL, that is new... This is from the original post... same 2.5Liter sohc engine, better sound, more fuel efficient and vvt, (variable valve timing....) VVT !!!!!! MORE POWER!!!!niiiiice !And then some of the replies... VVT on SOHC engines? I don't think that would work too well as your intake and exhaust are on the same cam. I'm guessing NA engines would get a DOHC engine with VVTVariable valve timing on a SOHC doesn't make sense IMO and doesn't exist on any foreign models. You'd be altering both intake and exhaust timing at the same time in same direction and I don't know if that would be a good thing, although it could be. Not picking on you Seth, because I saw your point, but I also knew it had been done in other places before and I am trying to enlighten the people who don't read threads, just posts ... By the way VVT and VVL are different, if the VVL mentioned above is like Toyota's VVL, it is much better than VVT... Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted March 15, 2005 Author Share Posted March 15, 2005 Actually he is showing that the SOHC engines will have VVL, that is new... This is from the original post... And then some of the replies... Not picking on you Seth, because I saw your point, but I also knew it had been done in other places before and I am trying to enlighten the people who don't read threads, just posts ... By the way VVT and VVL are different, if the VVL mentioned above is like Toyota's VVL, it is much better than VVT... Ted explain why one should be better than the other ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praedet Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Here is a quick find comparing the two VVT and VVL Basically , VVT alters only the cam timing (advancing or retarding as needed), whereas VVL (or VTEC) has extra cam lobes for high RPMs and alters the cam timing ... AVCS is Subarus I-VTEC, but I don't know for the SOHC engine. Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.