black318i Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 I didn't see AFR #1 in the logger menu so I thought you ment A/F Learning #1. Is it the WB O2 (my LC-1) output you want to see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 Oh. I didn't know you had an LC-1. You should always log the LC-1. However, I'm looking for AFR #1 which is the front O2 sensor. It will tell you what is going on with the CL to OL transition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 17, 2008 Author Share Posted November 17, 2008 Ok so log Parameter - Front O2 sensor #1, Unit -V right? I see there is a Front O2 sensor #2, I assume this is the post cat O2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 No. We don't have a front O2 sensor #2. That's only for the H6. The front O2 sensor should have units of either AFR or lambda or mA. I don't believe it should be voltage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 17, 2008 Author Share Posted November 17, 2008 Ok so A/F Sensor #1 http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/NewBitmapImage.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spec B Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 Here are some logs of random driving. Mostly typical and some not so typical driving habits. Looks like you had a knock event at Time: 678215, while under boost. Other than that, logs looks pretty clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 18, 2008 Author Share Posted November 18, 2008 Ok so A/F Sensor #1 http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/NewBitmapImage.jpg Anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testes1010 Posted November 18, 2008 Share Posted November 18, 2008 ^yes. A/F Sensor #1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snow05gtRI Posted November 18, 2008 Share Posted November 18, 2008 Ok so A/F Sensor #1 http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/NewBitmapImage.jpg heh, I thought you were answering your own question when posting this shot. It's the 13th option down in the left-most column. has "AFR" in the dropdown box for units. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 21, 2008 Author Share Posted November 21, 2008 Latest logs http://www.box.net/shared/nz1exh0oke http://www.box.net/shared/6s8xqacyyq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 The three knocks that I found of interest are: load rpm 1.19 3788 1.44 3085 2.64 4197 The first one could be intermittent. It only showed up once even though you drove through that range several times. The middle one was building boost. There may have been some lag in MAF response. The 3rd one was right after a shift. There was a knock right during shift when it was too lean. The first knock probably caused the second knock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 21, 2008 Author Share Posted November 21, 2008 So how do I address the knock issue or do I not have enough data yet. Should the FLKC table stay all 0's or are minor corrections considered acceptable? Also I checked my exhaust and could not find any leaks. I retorqued every nut and bolt and they were all fine. What else could cause A/F learning #1 A to go so positive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 What does your learning view look like? There are lots of strategies to address shift knock. Most of them don't work very well. One thing you can do is either shift slowly (me) or you can shift quickly but don't completely let go of the throttle. Keep a little bit on the throttle. This map does not address shift knock. As for the other knock, those are relatively minor. If your FLKC is showing significant FLKC that wasn't logged, then you'll need to RESET the ecu, and immediately start logging. Do continuous 2000 to redline logs at various CONSTANT throttle until you cover the entire map and find the knock. Or you can just reduce the base timing in the FLKC zone by 0.7 degrees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 21, 2008 Author Share Posted November 21, 2008 Here are the last two learnig views. The rest are already posted. I've been resetting my ecu a bit lately and I've lost track of how much driving I've done before each view, but its roughly 30-60 min. I'll work on some constant throttle loggs this weekend. http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/LearningView_SS_11-15-200851821PM.jpg http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/LearningView_SS_11-20-200851805PM.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Oh, sorry. I forgot that your problem is AFR Learning C. Your situation is not dangerous but it does look like you will need to scale your MAF for your configuration. Since you have a WBO2, you can use the method outlined here: http://www.romraider.com/forum/topic1871.html Before you start, double check all your connections. The last thing you want to do is tune a car with a leak. The large positive AFR Learning A is usually indicative of a small leak in the exhaust manifold or near the upipe joint. Look for ash trails. However, it could just be your setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 Would a leak from my IC explain my issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Not really. If you had a leak in your IC, I would expect AFR Learning D to be more negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 Hmm ok well if not now I fear it will soon. I found one bent tab that pretty much broke off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted November 23, 2008 Author Share Posted November 23, 2008 I would do it like this. However, you don't need to scale your MAF. http://www.romraider.com/forum/topic1871.html Does the data for this tool not require an ECU reset before logging? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 No. It doesn't require an ecu reset. In fact, it works better if everything is stabilized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted December 14, 2008 Author Share Posted December 14, 2008 So I installed a Perrin TMIC and now I get overboost. I thought there was a pressure drop with a larger IC. Do I tune this out with Max WGDC? http://www.box.net/shared/9ekbqvn07o http://www.box.net/shared/02pzcfx1lp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testes1010 Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 I thought there was a pressure drop with a larger IC. Do I tune this out with Max WGDC? Exactly, a lower pressure drop across the core = more pressure at the manifold. The max table definitely needs to be reduced a bit & it looks as though you may have to work on the TD tables as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 So I installed a Perrin TMIC and now I get overboost. I thought there was a pressure drop with a larger IC. Do I tune this out with Max WGDC? http://www.box.net/shared/9ekbqvn07o http://www.box.net/shared/02pzcfx1lp I can't see the logs. box.net must be down or something. Lower INITIAL AND MAX WGDC by the same amount in the rpms where you are exceeding boost target. Make sure that the difference between INITIAL and MAX are unchanged from the original map. This is very important. Don't touch the turbodynamics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black318i Posted December 15, 2008 Author Share Posted December 15, 2008 Ok thanks I'll update the maps and post logs. Here is a screen shot of the log. http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p38/mrsalty75/Forum/log.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeyd2005 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 You should drop initial and max by about 30% and retune the timing table. You probably want to check your fueling too. When AFR #1 = 12.63, your true AFR = VERY LEAN. You've got a LOT of knock going on there. Something's very wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.