mwiener2 Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 This is all at 5500 feet above sea level Here's my 91oct Dyno tune: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a257/mwiener2/001.jpg Then here's the switch to E85, only thing changed was injector scaling. http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a257/mwiener2/DiscoPotatoDyno.jpg Then today, finally got around dyno tuning the E85. http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a257/mwiener2/DynoE85001.jpg Doesn't look like much of a gain on the dyno, but on the street it's alot. We added a full 8 degrees of timing and then the DA went full positive. So she likes the E85, alot. This stuff just won't knock. My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Capacity Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 Wow, nice numbers for a Outback. Congrat's. 305,600miles 5/2012 ej257 short block, 8/2011 installed VF52 turbo, @20.8psi, 280whp, 300ftlbs. (SOLD). CHECK your oil, these cars use it. Engine Build - Click Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eVoMotion Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 WOW! Impressive! How many miles do you have on your engine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j255c Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 damn elevation makes it tough to make big numbers. 06 TB EVO IX SE stock turbo monster subaru hater Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eVoMotion Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 430+ hp in profile is crank? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urfsin Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Mike, take this thing to the 1/4 mile track and get some #'s!! Slide It Sideways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 13, 2008 Author Share Posted November 13, 2008 430 crank corrected for altitude last time I was at the track I got a 13.770 @ 102.08 i can't launch the car to save my life, so a very low 13 is possible. I also got a 103mph in 15 sec... so the power is there, i just can't launch it My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LGT-NY Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a257/mwiener2/DiscoPotatoDyno.jpg Love the name on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawl Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 im gonna tell boostjunkie to raise his car just to Fck with you then return to regular ride height so that your title of fastest outback will need an asterisk. car for sale. PM me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 13, 2008 Author Share Posted November 13, 2008 ^^ Still wouldn't be an outback... just a legacy with high heels on My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainmorgan Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I just put the car back on stilts while I get the coilovers rebuilt. She does pretty alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LGT-NY Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Nice numbers!!! Take that Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 14, 2008 Author Share Posted November 14, 2008 ^^ Is he at 5500 feet? My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradlgt21 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 wow 103 at 15 that is a bad launch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 14, 2008 Author Share Posted November 14, 2008 yup My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilT Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 So that's not very fast then Double Award Winning Legacy GT Wagon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 14, 2008 Author Share Posted November 14, 2008 no, it was fast, just not quick My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 damn elevation makes it tough to make big numbers. Disagree. The correction factor used on a dyno takes into consideration elevation (and temperature). He should be able to go down to sea level and get the same dyno numbers, assuming both dyno operators are using appropriate correction factors. His dyno plots are corrected. Elevation makes it tough to run fast quarter miles though. My '05 LGT My '07 Supercharged Shelby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous1 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 That and the fact that it is just a GT28, it is on the smaller side of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnAWD Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Congrats my high altitude brother. What boost pressure are you running? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eVoMotion Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 DANG! Wish my OBXT was this "slow." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KartRacerBoy Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Just don't try to turn you weiner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 14, 2008 Author Share Posted November 14, 2008 Disagree. The correction factor used on a dyno takes into consideration elevation (and temperature). It's not that fancy... a correction factor of 1.15 just adds 15% to what the dyno reads. So it's not all that close to what it would read at sea level. That and the fact that the turo will spool sooner, and hold longer at higher efficencies at sea level then up here. The GT28 is a smaller turbo. There are plans to put a larger one in. But I'm at the edge of fueling as is and the MAF can't handle much more airflow either. The OBXT handles just fine. I've had it on a road course twice now. My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 It's not that fancy... a correction factor of 1.15 just adds 15% to what the dyno reads. So it's not all that close to what it would read at sea level. That and the fact that the turo will spool sooner, and hold longer at higher efficencies at sea level then up here. Right, but the factor (percentage, whatever) that is added is theoretically based upon altitude and temperature. Seems many dyno operators just add some arbitrary number so I agree that it probably would read higher at sea level, but if correction factors were doing what they are supposed to do then it wouldn't be any different. It doesn't make sense to me that a dyno run done at sea level at 60 degrees would have any correction factor at all, but for some reason they do. We (at altitude), need the correction factors for comparison sake. Super adds 15% for a reason. Joe blow at sea level just adds it for dramatic effect. My '05 LGT My '07 Supercharged Shelby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwiener2 Posted November 15, 2008 Author Share Posted November 15, 2008 In either case, the curve will look differrent My Mods List (Updated 8/22/17) 2005 Outback FMT Running on Electrons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.