f1anatic Posted August 16, 2008 Share Posted August 16, 2008 I just got me Continental Conti Extreme Contact and by looking at the thread pattern, they seem to be winter based all-season ultra high performance tires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TobyR Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Is the 3D a replacement for the M3 or up a tier? TireRack seems to only have the M3s in typical scoob sizes. Might be it's still a bit early for full stock on 3Ds Also, I noticed someone saying they might run 205/50/17… Can you safely do that on a stock 08 wheel? It won't botch the odometer, etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSiWRX Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 I *thought* that the 3Ds were a M3 replacement, but the 3D's been out for more than a couple of seasons, now, and the M3s are still readily available. I honestly don't know what the deal is, between the 3D and M3 ...... <-- I love Winky, my "periwinkle" (ABP) LGT! - Allen / Usual Suspect "DumboRAT" / One of the Three Stooges '16 Outback, '16 WRX, 7th Subaru Family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYtoVT Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Is the 3D a replacement for the M3 or up a tier? TireRack seems to only have the M3s in typical scoob sizes. Might be it's still a bit early for full stock on 3Ds Also, I noticed someone saying they might run 205/50/17… Can you safely do that on a stock 08 wheel? It won't botch the odometer, etc? that was probably me; I decided to run the 205/50/17 Blizzak LM-22s on stock '07 wheels, which are 17x7. the 2.5i cars have 205/50/17 stock tires, at least the '05-'07s. all the stock 17" wheels for Legacys are 17x7. it doesn't blotch the speedometer, more than 1mph: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TobyR Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 it doesn't blotch the speedometer, more than 1mph: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html hope that helps. Got it. I thought they might both draw from the same revolutions. The 205/50/17 come up as a 'plus zero' size… I'm too daft to gather how that works. Maybe the +05 is not significant enough that it makes it a 'plus zero' where +10 to /55 would br the 'plus one' . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjundi Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 My experience with winter tires is nothing excels at every winter condition even 4" of snow. The problem is 4" can be powder, it can be very wet, essentially slush or icy. Usually a strength somewhere means a weakness in another. At this point I would buy the least expensive winter performance tire as long as it is not noisy. It will excel at one of the 4" of snow conditions. Nothing dominates all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSiWRX Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 ^ Exactly. I got what I got - the 3Ds - because of what people whom I trusted had said about their capabilities in slush and fresh powder (albeit not deep powder). For the wifey's car, I'm currently very tempted to, instead, get her some studless - or even studded - "ice and snows," since her driving style is distinctly different from mine, and as I think she'd find the extra safety on ice to be particularly beneficial, given her usual routes. There's nothing that's going to be best for every scenario. There's always compromises. <-- I love Winky, my "periwinkle" (ABP) LGT! - Allen / Usual Suspect "DumboRAT" / One of the Three Stooges '16 Outback, '16 WRX, 7th Subaru Family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krzyss Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Got it. I thought they might both draw from the same revolutions. The 205/50/17 come up as a 'plus zero' size… I'm too daft to gather how that works. Maybe the +05 is not significant enough that it makes it a 'plus zero' where +10 to /55 would br the 'plus one' . my car example 2005 Legacy GT OE tires 215/45R17 +0 -> 225/45R17 -0 -> 205/50R17 +1 -> 225/40R18 (215/45R18 would count as +1 too I believe) -1 -> would not fit over front brakes Krzys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
change_agent Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I wish I read this thread a couple of days ago I might have had a look at the Dunlop's. This year Quebec has brought in Mandatory Snow Tire Law between Nov15th and April 15th....so delemna what to get for the 2008 2.5i with 205/50R/17's? I looked at the Blizzak LM25...great in deep snow...not as effective on ice and slush...a posting on another treat said...on ice he slid through an intersection. Toyo Garrett: A dedicated winter tire with crushed walnuts for grip on ice...but only H rated. After record snow last year ...I was being told it was the tire to have...but on dry or wet...it would be mushy handling. The New Michelin Pilot Alpine PA3's ...last years PA3's are now called PrimacyPA3s....a new tread design...suppose to be better than last years. http://www.michelinman.com/tires/winter/pilot-alpin-pa3/#sizes-and-specifications Then what to do for rims. 1) Subaru Canada says steel 17" rims and winter tires on the stock suspension of a 2.5i Wagon. TOO HEAVY 2) winter alloy wheels 60$ more a rim. 3)Ah! use stock rims and get 18" rims and dedecated tires (Summer Rims 2x to 3x more expensive then cheaper winter alloy rims. ) And the roads in Quebec it is best sometimes to have a bit more sidewall ...it saves denting the rims and the rest of the suspension. Shopped arround parts of Ontario and Montreal...because this new law is a license to print money..then asked my Subaru Service Manager...what he could do...and he gave me the best price. Decision: The new Michelin's PA3's and a winter rim from FAST WHEELS and here is picture. Second Thoughts...Might have gone and had a look at the Dunlop's but Winter here in Quebec can be actually three conditions...deep snow,(as you can see in my avitar)... freezing rain (black ice), wet/slushy, & dry. Each of the tires had their strengths and weakness...so in many ways it will be a crap shot...and I guess this winter will tell . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
change_agent Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Ophs...had trouble posting and forgot to put the picture of the wheel.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sic GT Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I have had my Bridgestone Potenza RE 960 A/S for two winters. I spend about 1 month Jan-Feb in Jackson Hole, Wy. Where the routinely average 180" of snow per year (220" last year). If driven moderately to conservative in bad weather these tires have awesome winter traction. Good balance between a summer and winter tire too. Rain traction is the most impressive I have experienced in an ultra high performance all season tire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYtoVT Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I wish I read this thread a couple of days ago I might have had a look at the Dunlop's. This year Quebec has brought in Mandatory Snow Tire Law between Nov15th and April 15th....so delemna what to get for the 2008 2.5i with 205/50R/17's? Second Thoughts...Might have gone and had a look at the Dunlop's but Winter here in Quebec can be actually three conditions...deep snow,(as you can see in my avitar)... freezing rain (black ice), wet/slushy, & dry. Each of the tires had their strengths and weakness...so in many ways it will be a crap shot...and I guess this winter will tell . I'm originally from Rochester, NY. As you know, is just on the other side of the lake from Toronto. And now I live in the Burlington, VT area which is just outside of Montreal. So I'd say the weather I experience is similar, if not the same; I'd try Tirerack.com for snows. I believe they have the best and largest selections. Give them a call and compare prices. I really liked the M3's. And looking at its Tire Rack ratings, I'd say any other snow tire with ratings close to it or better will do you well. Also, you're not limited to the 205/50/17 size for fitment: http://www.discounttiredirect.com/direct/assignTireVehicle.do?yr=2008&mk=SUBARU&vid=012498 hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krzyss Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Also, you're not limited to the 205/50/17 size for fitment: http://www.discounttiredirect.com/direct/assignTireVehicle.do?yr=2008&mk=SUBARU&vid=012498 hope that helps. From sizes listed 205/50R17 seems to be the best for winter. Krzys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYtoVT Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 true. but the differences in sizes aren't major. especially w/ AWD. unless you're on the track recording lap times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krzyss Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I beg to differ. Winter is the season when you may need all the grip that you can get during normal driving, just like during track event (except in real life there is less space for error). So when buying winter tires I would buy narrower ones unless I can get slightly wider for much, much lower price (in my case: 205/50R17 the best, 215/45R17 possible if price is right, 225/45R17 I would hesitate even if I get them for free). Krzys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rock2534 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I have a set of Nokan WR's, although I really can't comment on their snow handling since we did not get much snow at all in PA last winter. I am running the stock tires until the winter comes, then I will switch back and hopefully get to have some fun in the snow. I can't see how they wouldn't be real good in the snow, I got around the first winter with the stock tires, so these can only be better. I used to run Blizzak MZ-02's on my FWD acura CL, even with 3/32's on them they still pulled through the snow with ease, so I have no complaints about them. Yes they are soft on the dry pavement, but that is to be expected, can't fault a tire for that, thats what soft rubber does. Also with regards to the noise comment about the WR's, I don't find them to be loud, UNLESS you are driving over patches of the tar sealant that they line some roads with, every time I run over those areas I can hear that distinctly, but again, who cares, I don't need my car to be silent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcTec34 Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 easy choice. RE92. WTMFW. j/k. idk.. im hoping that my new toyo proxies 4 arent THAT bad. and hey. anything has to be better than stock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest heightsgtltd Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 ^^ a/s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TobyR Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 ^^ a/s? Toyo Proxes 4 is a UHP AS tire. Usually priced about the same as Goodyears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest heightsgtltd Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 yeah, so why is he posting about them in the winter tire thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGT_Ltd_wagon Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 I run 3 sets of wheel/tires LM 25 mid- December thru end of February. I travel in Vermont and upstate NY in the winter and I've had enough of the all season stock RE-92 in the snow. My winter driveway in VT is scetchy at best so Full Snows are needed but I live in boston area and do a lot of highway driving so the LM 25's work well. In summer I have RE-01-R (which are unbelievable) but risky to use in early spring/ late fall so I use the stockers RE92 then. It's a lot but it works for me. Jib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcTec34 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 yeah, so why is he posting about them in the winter tire thread wow heights, calm down :-p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest heightsgtltd Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 don't blame me for your lack of reading comprehension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcTec34 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 it was my way of subscribing to the thread.. anyways.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSiWRX Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 im hoping that my new toyo proxies 4 arent THAT bad. and hey. anything has to be better than stock ^ Historically, people have rated the Proxes 4's winter traction above the Pirelli P-Zero Nero, but have rated them below that of the Falken ZIEX ZE51. If you're careful, you'll be just fine - and if you can find an empty lot, you can have a lot of fun. But definitely, they're far from dedicated winter tires, and their winter traction offers much less capability than even the "performance" winter tires. <-- I love Winky, my "periwinkle" (ABP) LGT! - Allen / Usual Suspect "DumboRAT" / One of the Three Stooges '16 Outback, '16 WRX, 7th Subaru Family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.