dmp Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 VERY refreshing piece on this blog: Searing meats does NOT “Lock in juices” or somehow make the meats more “juicy” - in fact, seared meats actually have a bit less juice than those which haven’t been seared. We who cook like the added texture searing bring to the table and that’s the primary reason for doing it. According to Cooks Illustrated: Food scientist Harold McGee debunked this conventional wisdom in his book “On Food and Cooking” (1984) when he proved that meat loses the same amount of liquid whether it has been seared or not. The real reason to sear meat is to obtain the best flavor by encouraging a process known as the Maillard reaction. In the early 1900s, French chemist Louis-Camille Maillard became the first to describe the effects–and gastronomic benefits–of browning meat. When meat is exposed to direct heat, sugars react with proteins to release hundreds and hundreds of flavor compounds. These compounds combine, break down, and multiply, creating deliciously intense flavors and rich brown coloration. http://www.winefoot.com/?p=119 SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds.
Guest JessterCPA Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Alton Brown also came to this conclusion.
rs6er Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Sounds to me like we should be searing it anyway, so why post?
dmp Posted March 12, 2008 Author Posted March 12, 2008 Alton Brown also came to this conclusion. you didn't follow the link, did ya? (Alton's episode was cited) SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds.
dmp Posted March 12, 2008 Author Posted March 12, 2008 Sounds to me like we should be searing it anyway, so why post? Sounds to me like you missed the point of the article anyway. so why post? The point was "stop spreading the lie about 'searing in juices'" You should only be searing if you want what searing does to the meat. (shrug). SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds.
rs6er Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 And why wouldn't you want what searing does to the meat? "creating deliciously intense flavors and rich brown coloration"
Brady Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I understand debunking a myth if the myth itself has no benefit, but in this case, it still stands as good measure to sear meat. So whatever people want to believe for the reason to do it, who cares. It still tastes better. Though just the same, it's an interesting article, and thanks for sharing. I'll continue to sear my steaks.
PGT Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 there's actually another school of thought and that's low temp cooking. Keeping the meat below 192F is critical....that's the point where the collagen is broken down.
rc0032 Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 Alton Brown also came to this conclusion. Alton delivers! there's actually another school of thought and that's low temp cooking. Keeping the meat below 192F is critical....that's the point where the collagen is broken down. I would say that this is dependent on the cut of meat and the content of collagen. But when it does breakdown (if present in quantity) the rewards are great!
silverfool Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 i've moved away from searing at the beginning of cooking. i do however hit it with high heat right before removing. i would think that would still get the Maillard reaction. do you guys subscribe to the turn only once philosophy?
PGT Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 with beef, I'll sear in a cast iron skillet in some light oil, then put it on the grill on low heat, turning once. with chicken, I get the grill up past 700F with all four burners going. I put it on for 30 seconds, get a nice sear, then flip it over on one side of the grill, turning the burners on that side down to the lowest setting, leaving the other side up higher to maintain 350F or so. Basically, this bakes the chicken. To serve, I flip the chicken over one last time to the hot side to get the crosshatching for presentation.
PGT Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 one thing with any meats....be sure to let them rest off heat for 3-5 minutes before cutting them. this lets the juices equally distribute. If you cut too soon, you lose it all onto the plate.
Gire Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 with beef, I'll sear in a cast iron skillet in some light oil, then put it on the grill on low heat, turning once. with chicken, I get the grill up past 700F with all four burners going. I put it on for 30 seconds, get a nice sear, then flip it over on one side of the grill, turning the burners on that side down to the lowest setting, leaving the other side up higher to maintain 350F or so. Basically, this bakes the chicken. To serve, I flip the chicken over one last time to the hot side to get the crosshatching for presentation. Nice method! I learned this technique by watching Steven Raichlen one episode of BBQ U. 'Indirect grilling' I think he called it.
silverfool Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 i do ok with steaks but am too inpatient with chicken. for chicken on the bone, i cheat and boil first (I know, it's sacrilege) and then grill with sauce. I'm too paranoid otherwise that i'm undercooking it. did some marinated breasts the other day, kept it low and slow for 10mins and it came out nice and juicy. when it comes to burgers though, i really suck. almost consistently over cook them to medium well without intending to.
underpowerd Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 one thing with any meats....be sure to let them rest off heat for 3-5 minutes before cutting them. this lets the juices equally distribute. If you cut too soon, you lose it all onto the plate. that is truly the key. they actually keep cooking a little after you take them out; i like to cover mine with something for these few minutes.
corykg Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 my meat always has juice and you gotta ask yourself, is the juice worth the squeeze?
silverfool Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 ^^ yup tented foil works why tented? why not covered with a flat sheet?
Guest heightsgtltd Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 because it keeps in the heat, but doesn't steam the meat
Guest JessterCPA Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 because it keeps in the heat, but doesn't steam the meat That's what she said.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.