Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

AHHH i totally screwed up today


Recommended Posts

so i decided to top off my oil and rotate my wheels before my 200mi road trip today . i have about 2800 miles on my oil. i added about a little over 1/4 quart.

 

anyway totally forgot to screw my oil cap back on. i usually just leave it on top of the battery while i'm servicing. i drove like that for 60mi until i stopped at toll booth and smelled oil fumes, then i thought to myself "AHHH shit did i screw the oil cap back on?!?" :lol:. anyway pulled over and checked. whew, oil cap still on top of the battery. and there was absolutely no oil splashing anywhere in the engine bay, i was amazed...and thankful :lol:. and oil level was still good.

 

one thing i did notice according to my MPG display; i was getting 31.9 mpg, for those 60mi, then it went back down to 29.1mpg for the rest of the trip with the cap on. driving conditions were the same through out and all highway. too much crank case pressure?!? do i need a new PCV? i'm at 62k and i need a tuneup asap; i'm just surprised at the difference in mpg with oil cap on and off.

 

i have a 08 2.5i. where is the PCV on these newer cars? on all the older non-turbo's i know it was directedly screwed into the intake manifold on the passenger side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally believe that you can breathe the wrong way inside the car and the MPG would change lol. I could go on a wild tangent about the fuel system and that trip computer but I wont. All Im gonna say is I dont trust it as far as I can throw it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

theres a difference between being precise and accurate. i think its precise, not accurate. i think its a useful tool to gauge changes in the condition of the motor.

 

from comparing my calculations vs the MPG gauge, its more accurate when you take long drives, but when you start doing a lot of mix driving thats when the gauge starts to be less accurate, maybe 1.5mpg off at the most. its a "moving average".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't even call it precise. Every Legacy I've been around, the mileage per the trip computer trends down over a tank of gas. It's a useful tool if you drive similar conditions and are comparing from tank to tank. But I wouldn't ever compare the first half of a tank and the second half of a tank, as my highest mileage has always been on the first 1/4 - 1/2 of a tank. Always.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't even call it precise. Every Legacy I've been around, the mileage per the trip computer trends down over a tank of gas. It's a useful tool if you drive similar conditions and are comparing from tank to tank. But I wouldn't ever compare the first half of a tank and the second half of a tank, as my highest mileage has always been on the first 1/4 - 1/2 of a tank. Always.

 

Of course your highest mileage is at the top of the tank! There are more miles in the upper portion of the tank!

 

Do you actually know how it measures fuel economy?

 

The ECU knows injector duty cycle, it knows how big the injectors are, and it knows how far you've driven. The ECU monitors distance traveled and divides it by the volume of fuel spit into the engine.

 

You get better economy at the top of a tank because the top of the tank has "more miles" in it, than the bottom. Ever notice, you'll get 100 miles on the first quarter tank, maybe 80 on the second quarter, and then 120 on the remaining half?

 

While you DO need data points to drive the MPG calculation to an appropriate average, what you can't rely on is the amount of fuel actually in the tank.

[URL="http://legacygt.com/forums/showthread.php/proper-flip-key-interesti-159894.html"]Flip Key Development Thread[/URL] "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped." - E. Hubbard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course your highest mileage is at the top of the tank! There are more miles in the upper portion of the tank!

 

Do you actually know how it measures fuel economy?

 

The ECU knows injector duty cycle, it knows how big the injectors are, and it knows how far you've driven. The ECU monitors distance traveled and divides it by the volume of fuel spit into the engine.

 

You get better economy at the top of a tank because the top of the tank has "more miles" in it, than the bottom. Ever notice, you'll get 100 miles on the first quarter tank, maybe 80 on the second quarter, and then 120 on the remaining half?

 

While you DO need data points to drive the MPG calculation to an appropriate average, what you can't rely on is the amount of fuel actually in the tank.

I'm not talking about the fuel guage though. I know the mileage computer measures off of injector cycle duty. I'm literally comparing to the same trip twice on the same tank. It was about 167 miles to the family cabin. I always got better mileage (per the trip computer that is) on a fresh tank of gas than a tank say "1/2" full.

 

It doesn't make sense to me, and honestly, I don't think the mileage was actually any different if I took the time to calculate it out for miles driven versus fuel used to fill the tank. I'm just saying that if he's using the computer as his measure of whether his mileage actually changed before and after the oil cap was in, I would disregard it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mega Users

It gives a total average of every reading. It gives a number around once a second. With a full tank and a clear trip, every input of the gas has a greater effect on the average because it won't get washed out by a lot of numbers. Think of it as exaggerating the average for the first half of the tank you use.

 

If you want to get an accurate reading over a whole tank, the only truly accurate way is to divide the miles on the previous tank by the amount of gas you use to completely fill up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use