Brady

It's not that it acts like 93, it's that we don't have enough air density to take advantage of it. If it acted like 93, we'd be able to burn more fuel and have higher power output, but that's not the case.

What a world we live in! http://nypost.com/2017/10/05/yoga-fanatics-want-designer-vagina-surgery-to-look-good-in-pants/

^Look at this sad sack of shit!

Don't worry, I you too.

When 700watts gets a bigger hard on for trolling me than actual yoga pants. And yeah, looks like creeper shots. Which further proves my point that some people are shitty people, but you'll say some inbred-minded bullshit that it proves women are dumb whores.

I have a job, and a life. GFY, you twit.

"But upskirts could be staged" ... Yeah, see, it's still dumb. And this started with someone taking a creeper shot, then continued with intentional postings of others that might be staged. Also, because something "could" be staged doesn't mean it was. You don't really know. So unless you're the one who took the shot and knows ...

It's ok guys. 700watts has invoked the "She was asking for it" defense of rapists, and Adoniram has shown he doesn't have the confidence to approach a real woman and instead takes a sad shot from afar to fap later and get a little admiration from sad rapists like 700watts. You two are adorable.

I never said I'd stop calling out creeper shots. I'll continue to do that as they show up. Especially if it appears that they may be underage.

Still a piece of shit. Possibly a piece of shit who posts pictures of underage girls in high school.

Last thing I'll say about this: If you're going to go after small spelling or grammar mistakes to criticize another, make sure your spelling and grammar are on point, or STFU and accept you're a hypocrite and a moron.

You've seen who goes to McDonald's, Right? Eww. No. Gross!

Because I don't know any paparazzi posting in here, or how to call them scumbag shit-stains directly, so I'm just calling it as I see it, where I see it.

The fact that you would secretly photograph someone, effectively hiding what you're doing says you have no spine, and your balls are there for show only. As for being a bitch, you can trade the term for piece of shit if you prefer, but it doesn't change the fact that you're a miserable asshole if you don't have the guts to ask if it's ok to take someone's picture. I don't know where this liberal shit is coming from, as any good bible toting, gun carrying conservative gentleman I know would quickly stand up and call you a piece of shit if they caught you taking pictures of a lady without her permission as well.

Go for it ... I'll still rightfully call you a spineless, sackless little bitch.

Likewise

I love how badly assholes get offended when you make a comment like "hey, maybe don't be an asshole."

Judging by the depth of field, I suspect it was an SLR, so no ... or the iphone 7, so maybe. I have no problem with beautiful women in yoga pants, just people taking creeper shots in general. Called out an asshole taking pictures of a guy who fell asleep with his mouth open at the airport recently. Not cool.

FJuan, better?

Because you can't take criticism inline? Oh no, I'm interrupting your precious thread. What a whiner.

So again, it's the onus on the woman to wear a burlap sack so as not to reveal any bodily form? What if he's out running? What if she just wants to pick up tea on her way home from the gym? You're the one justifying something else. That something else is being a disrespectful piece of shit to strangers. Again, if you don't have the balls or decency to ask if it's ok to use someone's picture online, GFY.

At what point is it straight up victim blaming? Your entire argument is "well, she brought it on herself for going out like that". So if she was in great shape and was wearing a well tailored business suit that also showed her figure, it would also be perfectly acceptable to take a picture of her ass because you saw her bending over to get something out of the back seat of her car? At what point do you draw the line and accept that you're just a piece of shit who doesn't respect women or their minimal expectation of not being surreptitiously photographed for a couple cheap "Thanks" on LGT.com?

Here's the thing, dude. If I catch someone taking a creeper pic in public, I'm going to call that piece of shit out hard and fast. Do it to someone I love, and you're getting more than called out. In conclusion: GFY Edit: I'll go a step further. If you don't have the balls to simply ask a person if it's ok to take his or her picture, you're a low life piece of shit if you think it's ok to take their picture to share online for just about any reason. Even if it's for something good they've done. Get permission first. It's the only decent way to act.

So, just to be clear, you're saying you wouldn't do or say shit if you caught a guy taking a picture of your wife's or daughter's ass? Let alone if you knew he was posting it online? And this is EXACTLY the place to debate morality. I'm calling it as I see it, where I see it. Not going to let it slide and pretend it didn't happen here.

What are you cooking that smells so bad you don't want it in the house? Why would you eat that?!