Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

underground000

I Donated
  • Posts

    1,373
  • Joined

Posts posted by underground000

  1. best explaination, our fogs are close to the car because most asian people are short (ex: my parents and cousins...) so they sit really close to the steering wheel. Wait! the Legacy was made in America:lol:. If u want to see using the fogs adjust them up. The way mine sits I can tell they are on, but It illumitaes large dips in the road better than low beam
  2. The input clutch connects the input shaft gear assembly to the rear assembly (output shaft) when engaging 4th and 5th. It doesn't appear that the actual gears are failing, just the clutches. It must be a bit weak for extra power. Maybe that is the clutch assembly that some people are adding clutch disks to.

     

    correct people add clutches to the clutch assemblies to hold more power.

     

    Dont know if they make it for Subaru's but theres a company that makes a clutch/steel on 1 piece of steel (if that makes sense) So one side is a clutch and the other side is a steel. This way you can pack almost twice as many clutches/steels in the assembly. Normally its clutch stacked next to a steel

     

    Something like this

    http://www.britcycle.com/products/images/571362D001.jpg

     

    Vs normal type

    http://www.ahpminis.com/store/images/0404.JPG

  3. I believe it is a combination of both the gears and bands that let go due to the heat caused by the added stressed of WOT shifting at stg2+.

     

    I took a look at the 08 transmission and theres no bands just pistons/clutches. The brakes are also piston/clutches

     

    Input Clutch

    Direct Clutch

    Reverse Brake

    Forward Brake

    Low Coast Brake

     

    What happens is the Brakes let go and the brakes restricts reverse rotation of sun gear or lock sun gear

     

    I have some understanding of auto trans, I took them completely apart and put them back together before

  4. I upped my requested torque from 350 to 498 (max is 500), only upped the requested torque for S#

     

    running OTS Cobb ACN Stage 1, w/ lightweight crank pulley

     

    The other day I was on freeway to freeway on ramp, shifted to S#, manual shifted to 2nd gear, right after it rev matched I floored it and it seemed liked it free reved - was not pulling in 2nd. I quickly shifted to 3rd and was fine. I dont know what happened and didnt look at rpms/boost but knew I was going about 43mph. I know what 40mph in 2nd gear feels like

     

    Maybe it didnt catch 2nd gear or hopefully was not slipping in 2nd

     

    Im not concerned yet, just letting you guys know what happened

  5. little stretch look on a 9.5 would be 245-255

     

    just confirming fit on struts and lowering springs? not coilovers? opie is using struts and lowering springs

     

    Thanks

     

    I am taking notes for future

     

    Whats the offset, I think theres 2 offsets for this rim size??

  6. Oh most definitely.

     

    About what tire size would you guess you can run, possible to have very little stretch tire look?, most of the guys are running coilovers with these rims thats why im asking

     

    Thanks

     

    Love the look!!

  7. Did you try manually shifting the gears? I don't even mind the stock shifting for regular driving, as long as it would "SHIFT_RIGHT_(*&@#$_NOW" when I hit up/down, instead of waiting for a consensus from the characters in Herman's Head..

     

    I always drive in manual mode. There is still the delay when you tell it to shift to when it shifts. But what I noticed from factory it downshifts nearly instantly when I tell it to

  8. So how does this affect us guys with the IPT valve body?

     

     

    There's not much to say yet from tuning the tcu or the Accessport Req Torque changing. I do not have a VB mod. The hypothesis is increase even more line pressure then the VB mod (for those who have it) for more clamping power without spening $5k for full trans build. But don't expect this to hold 500hp with just tcu mod and VB Mod

  9. Nice start!!! I adjusted the top row of the throttle table, the one that is the table header. It is scaled up by the same % the RTq map is scaled up. You may have found something else since you did not adjust the accelerator map, which is that the manual states that throttle plate position and accelerator position are also pulled from the ecu to determine trans behavior. I wish I could work on this side by side with you, but I am still getting tuned, and am chasing a pesky air leak. Hopefully we can figure out exactly where to add pressure to benefit us with a greater clamping safety margin, without sacrificing comfort when it is not needed. I'm sure there is sn optimal way to tune these accelerator tables for trans behavior.

     

    Can u post The accel table u also adjusted. I'm scared to adjust it too much. Like having too much of a range:lol newb at tuning

     

    EDIT: Just looked, Requested Torque: the top row is Accel Position. Theres another chart for Throttle Angles and I was going to adjust that. I guess I wasnt paying much attention. And was thinking Throttle Angle is the same as Accel Position. I dont think Ill need to adjust Accel Position Do I?

  10. So adjusting the Req Torque did make a difference. When I tested earlier I was doing WOT runs, today I was just doing city driving. There was not a difference in shifting, but there was more 'resistance' while driving. From what I understand for more 'resistance' is the lockup is gradual, not on/off. So adding more line pressure added more lock up at a lower rpm. I only changed S#, so when I changed to S the resistance was gone/decreased, and shifted back to S# resistance I can feel some resistance.

     

    I did have a 2-3 upshift bang and that might have gotten a bit worse at higher rpms but I dont really know. What I do know if downshifting from 2-1 at high rpm it hit 1st pretty hard after rev matching, this is around 32mph

     

    My concern now is if we have a pressure plate for lockup, will the increase line pressure at lower rpm and higher lockup wear the pressure plate more? Or whatever part is for lockup?

     

    I did not adjust the Throttle Angles

  11. Fishbone. There's another table that says Throttle Angle iirc. It's the last table/picture I posted on the previous page.Req Torque on top row and your changing Throttle Angle. Did u change anything there? If u did can u post it also?

     

    Thanks

     

    EDIT: I read it earlier on my phone. Its just a OTS Stage 2, nothing else done. Ill compare a Stage 2 to a Stage 1 and see any diff. There is no diff in Cobb OTS Stage 1 91, 93, ACN 91

  12. ClimberD said to adjust down Throttle Angle, how much/should I adjust. Down would be less numbers but letting you guys know it goes up to 100. I dont know/cannot add more columns. So do I need to adjust 333 to 490:confused: Orig Map went over 333 in Req Torque so I assume ill be fine:confused:

     

    BTW Si-Drive, all Req Torque chart is different in the 3 modes, so is also Throttle Angle chart

     

    I increased Req Torque from 350 to 490 (look at earlier chart)

     

    This map is Cobb Stage 1 ACN91

    1st pic what I adjusted, made it 490 @ 100 Accel Position

    2nd pic what I should also adjust according to ClimberD

    http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt49/underground000/1.png?t=1287212647

    http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt49/underground000/2.png?t=1287212647

  13. Aside from smoothness, any reduction of shift time noticed? Even with the IPT VB I notice it still takes a long time to shift at higher RPMs.

     

    I dont think there was a reduction in shift time. Plus I have an 08 and they reduced the shift time anyways

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use