Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

Subaru dual clutch auto....bring it!


DanT55

Recommended Posts

Does anyone think it would be an in house design or something that they would outsource to say...... Jatco? If they could do something similar to the 370Z with rev matching that would be the ticket. I am hoping its only a matter of time.

 

DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone think it would be an in house design or something that they would outsource to say...... Jatco? If they could do something similar to the 370Z with rev matching that would be the ticket. I am hoping its only a matter of time.

 

DT

 

Please explain. The 370Z's SynchroRev Match is on the 6-speed manual transmission. Doesn't Subie already offer rev-matching in the 5-speed auto?

 

I find it funny that Hyundai's Veloster and the new Focus will have a dual-clutch, but Subie (and a few others) still has 4 (chuckle) and 5-speed slushbox autos. Actually if it's going to be anything like the one from Mitsu, I'd say they'd be better off sticking with adding an extra ratio to the 5-speed box.

-Brandon

2007 Chevrolet Suburban LT3

1981 Chevrolet C10 LWB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain. The 370Z's SynchroRev Match is on the 6-speed manual transmission. Doesn't Subie already offer rev-matching in the 5-speed auto?

 

I find it funny that Hyundai's Veloster and the new Focus will have a dual-clutch, but Subie (and a few others) still has 4 (chuckle) and 5-speed slushbox autos. Actually if it's going to be anything like the one from Mitsu, I'd say they'd be better off sticking with adding an extra ratio to the 5-speed box.

 

Sorry, I had two thoughts going at once. If not a DC then syncro rev matching in the manual would be nice. Yes, the 5 speed auto does have this feature but I don't think the 5sp auto is very performance oriented to begin with and can't reliably deal with the power of an STI or Staged LGT.

 

Subaru has a fairly unique tranny layout so anything designed for them would have to meet their layout requirements, reliability and durability testing, etc. They may be made by another company but Subaru is ultimately responsible for the integration and performance.

 

Maybe they know something about long term reliability of DC auto's and DI engine's and are waiting for technology to improve or are still testing concepts? Either way I hope to see them do both in the next 1-2yrs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I had two thoughts going at once. If not a DC then syncro rev matching in the manual would be nice. Yes, the 5 speed auto does have this feature but I don't think the 5sp auto is very performance oriented to begin with and can't reliably deal with the power of an STI or Staged LGT.

 

Subaru has a fairly unique tranny layout so anything designed for them would have to meet their layout requirements, reliability and durability testing, etc. They may be made by another company but Subaru is ultimately responsible for the integration and performance.

 

Maybe they know something about long term reliability of DC auto's and DI engine's and are waiting for technology to improve or are still testing concepts? Either way I hope to see them do both in the next 1-2yrs!

 

No worries, I just thought I'd missed something Nissan-related. LOL!

 

I will say that I was fairly isappointed in the Subie 5AT's rev-matching as opposed to the unit in the M35 I drove. The one in the Infiniti almost seemed telepathic in it's responses while the one in the Subie felt gimmicky.

 

The current Leggy 5 speed may not hold up to the current power of the STi or modded LGT/WRX, but I think it would be cheaper/wiser to reinforce these to handle the extra power as opposed to developing a DC gearbox while adding a 6th ratio for added economy.

 

Dual-clutch gearboxes found in most non-exotic applications don't actually handle extra power all that well and durability has come into question as of late-this could be why there hasn't been much talk in adopting one. Especially one that will use the layout that Subies have. Most "affordable" DC boxes are found in cars that are FWD or FWD-based AWD cars. I would think a longitudally configured box would be a more expensive venture Subaru is not quick to jump into. From what I've seen, it looks like they're more interested in refining their powerplants first.

 

Aisin filed for a Dual Clutch patent in Feb of 2010 and it was published in Sept 2010. Not sure where this fits in with Subaru though.

 

I would think they'd wind up staying with a Jatco unit.

-Brandon

2007 Chevrolet Suburban LT3

1981 Chevrolet C10 LWB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aisin filed for a Dual Clutch patent in Feb of 2010 and it was published in Sept 2010. Not sure where this fits in with Subaru though.

 

Since Subaru already has a CVT gearbox I can't see any real place for a double clutch gearbox.

 

And I suspect that the manual gearboxes will stick around a lot longer, especially in Europe.

453747.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Tony

I have not heard any reliabiltity issues with DC transmissions that have not been directly linked to user abuse like hard launches and overheating the clutches. There are many ways to skin the proverbial cat but I am familiar with the new Porsche PDK and I like the design. Two manual trans in one housing and two wet clutches launch control and temp limiting for durability.

What I like about it the most is that trans could work in a Subaru if the was geared to spin in the right direction.( as is it is backward hence rear engine.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Subaru already has a CVT gearbox I can't see any real place for a double clutch gearbox.

 

And I suspect that the manual gearboxes will stick around a lot longer, especially in Europe.

 

If they drop a cvt into the LGT or STI it would ruin them. It's ok in the lower power base models but not for higher performance versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mega Users
I think the double clutch sequential gear box will come eventually. They already have a relationship with Jatco and they are pretty reliable transmissions. They will likely stick with them. I think the double clutch will be an option for the STI at some point down the line, but they will still keep the manual. Manuals aren't going anywhere. There will always be people who want more control of their drive train.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they drop a cvt into the LGT or STI it would ruin them. It's ok in the lower power base models but not for higher performance versions.

 

Can you explain why that would be the case?

 

A CVT would be able to keep the engine continuously at optimal power output which a stepped gearbox can't.

 

The only real problem is to make sure that the CVT can handle the power - the rest is a software issue.

 

And don't say that CVT:s can't be used for racing - they have tried it in F1 already in 1993 but it was banned.

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3UpBKXMRto]YouTube - Williams FW15C CVT[/ame]

453747.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool vid! If they can make a CVT that can reliably handle the power then I would consider it.

 

I just like the feel and traditional aspects of ratio gear boxes and a DC auto would satisfy that with nice day to day driveability(auto) with excellent performance capability(manual). I have driven an Outback with CVT and it was not that enjoyable. Ruins the experience I guess you could say. Just my .02.

 

Rgds,

 

DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mega Users

^

That's because the CVTs around now are being used for fuel economy, not performance. When a major manufacturer gets off their asses and makes a quality CVT that can take the abuse that it would withstand...non-stop peak torque, it will probably become popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hence my preference for a DC auto. Lighter, less expensive and more compact along with fitting into existing manual tranny packaging. CVT is now for the lower end of the market... small and/or lower powered cars needed to hit CAFE numbers.

 

That's my take until, like you said, someone brings one to the market that can deal with power and weight.

 

Until then lets stick with the dual clutch discussion!

 

DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Subaru's unique reliance on boxer engines causes transmission packaging issues. While not impossible, it is much more difficult/expensive for Subaru to introduce a new transmission.

 

DCTs do have reliability issues. VW has had at least one recall on their DCTs for control unit failures and have extended many powertrain warranties due to ongoing issues and loss of customer faith. IIRC, the price tag for the control unit repair for those outside of warranty was >2k. Many GTI owners that purchased a DSG will never buy another.

 

I would also recommend driving a DSG before jumping fully on that bandwagon. Many lurch during low-speed creep situations and will roll back significantly on a steep hill because the first clutch engages too slowly.

 

For me, the deal-breaker is the ~half second delay between when you hit the gas (from a complete stop) and when the car actually starts to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Tony

I have not heard any reliabiltity issues with DC transmissions that have not been directly linked to user abuse like hard launches and overheating the clutches. There are many ways to skin the proverbial cat but I am familiar with the new Porsche PDK and I like the design. Two manual trans in one housing and two wet clutches launch control and temp limiting for durability.

What I like about it the most is that trans could work in a Subaru if the was geared to spin in the right direction.( as is it is backward hence rear engine.)

 

This

 

...DCTs do have reliability issues. VW has had at least one recall on their DCTs for control unit failures and have extended many powertrain warranties due to ongoing issues and loss of customer faith. IIRC, the price tag for the control unit repair for those outside of warranty was >2k. Many GTI owners that purchased a DSG will never buy another.

 

I would also recommend driving a DSG before jumping fully on that bandwagon. Many lurch during low-speed creep situations and will roll back significantly on a steep hill because the first clutch engages too slowly.

 

For me, the deal-breaker is the ~half second delay between when you hit the gas (from a complete stop) and when the car actually starts to move.

-Brandon

2007 Chevrolet Suburban LT3

1981 Chevrolet C10 LWB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine has one of the new Lancer Ralliarts with the same transmission and Evo-beating mods and I hate that DCT. At low speeds it acts like a CVT, taking a second to engage and then it kinda slams into 2nd then it's 3rd4th5th6th up to ~45 mph, "OOPS stop sign coming up!" (brakes) 6th5th4th3rd2nd.....1st, no wait 2nd....now 1st. That thing is TOO busy! It's like some ADHD kid playing Pole Position. I guess it's okay if you're racing the pavement from light to light or stop sign to stop sign, but as a DD I would be annoyed.

-Brandon

2007 Chevrolet Suburban LT3

1981 Chevrolet C10 LWB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...ah, no wonder the Fozzy still has the 4EAT :lol:. I think there is a point of dimenisioning returns on how many gears you need to work thru. Anyway, I am surprised the Mitsu tranny goes to 6th at those speeds. Seems to be a programming issue. I need to go drive one and see how it feels.

 

DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use