Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

Best MOTORing Vid of SpecB v. IS350 v. g35 v. 335i


Recommended Posts

Posted

[ame=http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5878924536670716304]EDIT:[/ame] Sorry Video pulled...

 

 

Interesting Video by Best MOTORing of track comparison of 2007 Skiline(g35), 2007 IS350, and 2007 335i sedan. It is entirely in japanese, so the naration is lost on me.

 

edit: just watched the video. In the track test they ran a Legacy 2.0 G with the other cars.

 

Looks like they did a test of the skylines new 4WAS system and they seemed impressed. It showed a considerable improvement in the slalom.

Posted

The Legacy didn't stand a chance on anything remotely straight against any of these cars.

 

But it still managed to get the 2nd best lap time of the group.

Posted

So...2L turbo v. 2 3.5L N/A cars and a 3L twin-turbo...I'd say the Legacy made a damn fine showing, twinscroll or no. Too bad they didn't do a standing start in the rain :-)

 

Sweet video!

sorry...this forum practically blows goat nuts so im not always on here.
Team Pony Express

POSTED FROM MY COMPUTER USING A WEB BROWSER

Posted
meh, but really, how many people will keep their legacy stock? Stage 1.5/2 LGT should still be _way_ less maintenance than a 335i. yeah yeah blah blah stock vs stock unfair etc etc, even if I upgrade to the 08/09/etc LGT it will immediately have stage 2..
Posted

Surprised price wise with that test......The LGT is a good 5-7k less than any of those models.

 

just shows me & should show Subaruthe LGT @ least needs a VF39 & HP & TQ really need to be in the 285/285 range

Toyota 6EATS .........SUCK!!!!!!
Posted
Surprised price wise with that test......The LGT is a good 5-7k less than any of those models.

 

in Japan or here?

Posted
Surprised price wise with that test......The LGT is a good 5-7k less than any of those models.

 

just shows me & should show Subaruthe LGT @ least needs a VF39 & HP & TQ really need to be in the 285/285 range

 

Are you serious?

Posted

The LGT is outgunned by over 50hp in every one of the other cars:(:(

 

Sure the LGT is the lightest but not enough to make up for the lack of HP. As Deer stated make it a base Stage II car & it would be very interesting

Toyota 6EATS .........SUCK!!!!!!
Posted
I would think the 2.0 engine would have less grunt when the turbo isn't spooled up, which would make it slower on the track.
Except it spools quicker than a 2.5 and it's turbo and the turbo flows more up top AND the engine revs higher. AAAAND it makes more power stock...
Posted

just goes to show Subaru needs to add *voice of Jeremy Clarkson* "MORE POWER!!!" to it...

 

 

also, any luck on finding this thing translated. I would like to know what they said, esp about that 4 wheel active steering...

Posted

Don't forget also that the AWD helped the Subaru obtain a better laptime since the test was in the rain.

 

Not sure why the car was paired up with the other ones, but it was nice to see it in action.

 

Too bad the US engines aren't over there--I'm curious how it'd perform on that track.

-ben

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use