doublechaz Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 The OBDII-ish port on the 95 is pretty useless for data logging. It has a sample rate of about 1 per second which would completely miss the fuel trim and MAF spikes. My wideband will tell me the actual AFR and do it often enough to see the problem. Also, I use torque pretty much all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setnev Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 The OBDII-ish port on the 95 is pretty useless for data logging. It has a sample rate of about 1 per second which would completely miss the fuel trim and MAF spikes. My wideband will tell me the actual AFR and do it often enough to see the problem. Also, I use torque pretty much all the time. Ah yes, that's right 95, the red headed year for OBD2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doublechaz Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 I think that port is around 40kbit/s. Seems like they could get more data through that than what they do, but that *is* getting toward 10,000 times slower than our internet these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.