Brady

What a world we live in!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/05/yoga-fanatics-want-designer-vagina-surgery-to-look-good-in-pants/

When 700watts gets a bigger hard on for trolling me than actual yoga pants.

And yeah, looks like creeper shots. Which further proves my point that some people are shitty people, but you'll say some inbred-minded bullshit that it proves women are dumb whores.

where captain save-a-hoe? haven't heard from him lately

I have a job, and a life. GFY, you twit.

"But upskirts could be staged" ...

Yeah, see, it's still dumb. And this started with someone taking a creeper shot, then continued with intentional postings of others that might be staged.

Also, because something "could" be staged doesn't mean it was. You don't really know. So unless you're the one who took the shot and knows ...

It's ok guys. 700watts has invoked the "She was asking for it" defense of rapists, and Adoniram has shown he doesn't have the confidence to approach a real woman and instead takes a sad shot from afar to fap later and get a little admiration from sad rapists like 700watts.

You two are adorable.

I see we're not dealing with the sharpest tool the shed but, we all should've known this by recent history. Just for your edification and education, I never questioned your grammar skills I questioned your vocabulary or lack there of... that is all, carry on with said ignorance... like so

I never said I'd stop calling out creeper shots. I'll continue to do that as they show up. Especially if it appears that they may be underage.

3) "if I'd like", I'm not an English scholar but now we are showing a loose grasp of the English language or are we trying to change definitions?

Last thing I'll say about this: If you're going to go after small spelling or grammar mistakes to criticize another, make sure your spelling and grammar are on point, or STFU and accept you're a hypocrite and a moron.

Would it be better if it was at a McDonald's?

You've seen who goes to McDonald's, Right? Eww. No. Gross!

Because I don't know any paparazzi posting in here, or how to call them scumbag shit-stains directly, so I'm just calling it as I see it, where I see it.

Holy smokes, what we have here is the rare internet tough guy in there native environment. Anywho......all of which posted would be incorrect. I do have a spine, my sack hangs a little lower than I'd like, I'm far from small, and if your using the term bitch as a derogatory term meaning angry female or female in cycle; the term hypocrite of the highest order come to mind. Now I'm quite sure I'm dealing a brainwashed confused liberal....and for the final note, on the occasion I'm also known as cube...

 

 

Still holding for business-suit-yoga-pants-creeper-shot... come on peeps don't disappoint...

The fact that you would secretly photograph someone, effectively hiding what you're doing says you have no spine, and your balls are there for show only. As for being a bitch, you can trade the term for piece of shit if you prefer, but it doesn't change the fact that you're a miserable asshole if you don't have the guts to ask if it's ok to take someone's picture.

I don't know where this liberal shit is coming from, as any good bible toting, gun carrying conservative gentleman I know would quickly stand up and call you a piece of shit if they caught you taking pictures of a lady without her permission as well.

That picture offended me, therefore it must be taken down...on that note, can anyone find some yoga pants business suit creeper shots please?

Go for it ... I'll still rightfully call you a spineless, sackless little bitch.

Just making a point.

 

You are here by choice.

 

Rules are being followed.

 

You don't like it, don't participate. Pretty simple.

Likewise

Judging by the depth of field, I suspect it was an SLR, so no ... or the iphone 7, so maybe.

I have no problem with beautiful women in yoga pants, just people taking creeper shots in general. Called out an asshole taking pictures of a guy who fell asleep with his mouth open at the airport recently. Not cool.

Because you can't take criticism inline? Oh no, I'm interrupting your precious thread. What a whiner.

So again, it's the onus on the woman to wear a burlap sack so as not to reveal any bodily form? What if he's out running? What if she just wants to pick up tea on her way home from the gym?

You're the one justifying something else. That something else is being a disrespectful piece of shit to strangers.

Again, if you don't have the balls or decency to ask if it's ok to use someone's picture online, GFY.

Perhaps you should tell said loved one to not venture to public space with there ass hanging out, could save yourself a lot of energy...ass for the rest....keep messing with the bull, one day you'll get the horns.

At what point is it straight up victim blaming? Your entire argument is "well, she brought it on herself for going out like that". So if she was in great shape and was wearing a well tailored business suit that also showed her figure, it would also be perfectly acceptable to take a picture of her ass because you saw her bending over to get something out of the back seat of her car? At what point do you draw the line and accept that you're just a piece of shit who doesn't respect women or their minimal expectation of not being surreptitiously photographed for a couple cheap "Thanks" on LGT.com?

Here's the thing dude, if a person goes to a public space with there ass hanging out and someone takes a picture of said ass and posts it, several thing come to mind.

1) you have no expectation of privacy in a public space

2) person posted is unidentifiable unless you're able to ID that person by there ass. If so, hopefully that's a short list of people.

3) said person is responsible for wearing said clothes that allow dat ass to be viewed by the public.

 

That's said, the photographer is well within his or her rights to take a picture and post it. As for morality, there is nothing amoral about taking a picture of an ass that the person obviously put on display for the public. So please get off your high horse and use your moral standards for something useful like curtailing abortions or gang violence.

Here's the thing, dude. If I catch someone taking a creeper pic in public, I'm going to call that piece of shit out hard and fast. Do it to someone I love, and you're getting more than called out.

In conclusion: GFY

Edit: I'll go a step further. If you don't have the balls to simply ask a person if it's ok to take his or her picture, you're a low life piece of shit if you think it's ok to take their picture to share online for just about any reason. Even if it's for something good they've done. Get permission first. It's the only decent way to act.

Couldn't disagree more, but this isn't the thread for a debate on morality so I will leave it at that.

So, just to be clear, you're saying you wouldn't do or say shit if you caught a guy taking a picture of your wife's or daughter's ass? Let alone if you knew he was posting it online?

And this is EXACTLY the place to debate morality. I'm calling it as I see it, where I see it. Not going to let it slide and pretend it didn't happen here.

Tell me you'd feel the same if it was your Wife or Daughter who was the subject of that picture? What if you caught someone taking a creeper pic of one of your loved ones?

Illegal? I suppose not. Totally asshole move? I argue yes.