asdf1234 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Legacy GT vs 09 A4 2.0 automatic + awd for both car and driver got the a4 0-60 in 5.7 any opinions? how does quattro awd compare to subaru awd? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godwhomismike Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 '09 Legacy GT for a superior AWD system, and superior audio system. Just can the stock tires and get something better. Subaru makes a 'performance' catback exhaust system that you can have installed at the time off purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobE Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Quattro > Symmetrical http://newenglandsubarus.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Legacy GT vs 09 A4 2.0 automatic + awd for both car and driver got the a4 0-60 in 5.7 any opinions? how does quattro awd compare to subaru awd? thanks The winner will be GT-R with Chuck Norris at the wheel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godwhomismike Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 The winner will be GT-R with Chuck Norris at the wheel. ...until Nissan voids the transmission warranty because you looked at it the wrong way and it broke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 ...until Nissan voids the transmission warranty because you looked at it the wrong way and it broke. Geez you're dumb. Do you believe everything you read? I guess so. GT-R doesn't need launch control, GT-R will be faster without it. You can't comprehend the greatness of GT-R! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPLGT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 FYI Chuck Norris can run faster 0-60 than the GT-R. Rehab is for quitters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 FYI Chuck Norris can run faster 0-60 than the GT-R. True, but GT-R has seat warmers and it's getting cold outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 GT is bigger, faster, cheaper, and more reliable. Where is the competition? Well actually, i guess with the 5EAT you may be a little slower to 60 but there is no replacement for displacement as you yanks keep reminding me....so midrange the LGT will be quicker. Seriously guys cmon, stay on topic...if he asked a dumb question or reposted or mentioned the spec b or the GTR then you could destroy his thread, but his question was genuine and quite a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobE Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 GT is bigger, faster, cheaper, and more reliable. Where is the competition? Well actually, i guess with the 5EAT you may be a little slower to 60 but there is no replacement for displacement as you yanks keep reminding me....so midrange the LGT will be quicker GT is no longer bigger... and its only faster in manual form. http://newenglandsubarus.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPLGT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 True, but GT-R has seat warmers and it's getting cold outside. Chuck doesn't get cold. You should know that. Rehab is for quitters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Chuck doesn't get cold. You should know that. He may not get cold, but he still likes a warm ass. Unfortunately he doesn't always have the freshly dead bodies of his enemies to use as ass warmers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 GT is no longer bigger... and its only faster in manual form. Uhoh! but for how long....2010 lgt should trump it right....right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Uhoh! but for how long....2010 lgt should trump it right....right? The LGT is about as likely to get a meaningful redesign by 2010 as I am to sprout wings and start flying. If it does get a redesign Subaru will drop the 2.5L Turbo and only offer a 2.5L NA, or a 3.0L H6. Maybe not even the H6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Shut up, just shut up, i can't bare it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Yeah Jacks you got here just in time for the "leadership" of this country to start making sure that fun to drive cars are basically not feasible to make anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 , does this mean that not only my car but my car type will be getting rarer and rarer? is rarer a word? And FTR ive already been here 8 years:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If you want rarer to be a word then it can be in my book. I am not the spelling and grammar police (that is Heights' job). If it makes you feel better to believe that your car will become scarce and somehow valuable then by all means delude yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I already have, its too late, cmon only 86 of these were EVER made! its gta be worth around $300,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I already have, its too late, cmon only 86 of these were EVER made! its gta be worth around $300,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacks GT Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I might just try it, put it on ebay for a rediculous amount, stating that there are only 86 worldwide, see if i get any responses from rich snobs with too much money and no time to research, it would make my day to sell this thing for 300k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard B. Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 5.7 is really HARD to swallow...with 211hp? for base price of 39k you could get the 265hp v6 quattro. edmunds is saying 6.6 due to its 3800lbs. thats with the v6. "Let's get this part out of the way — despite the additional traction provided by its all-wheel-drive system, the 3,870-pound Audi A4 is just too portly to keep pace with the C350 in the stoplight grand prix. Acceleration to 60 mph consumes 6.9 seconds (6.6 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the A4 clicks the quarter-mile in 15 seconds flat at 94.7 mph. Audi's 3.2-liter direct-injected V6 is smooth and emits a pleasantly distinctive warble, but it will take more than its 265 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque to out-drag the leaner C350." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 ^ Much less keep pace with the scorching 335i. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asdf1234 Posted November 23, 2008 Author Share Posted November 23, 2008 5.7 is really HARD to swallow...with 211hp? for base price of 39k you could get the 265hp v6 quattro. edmunds is saying 6.6 due to its 3800lbs. thats with the v6. "Let's get this part out of the way — despite the additional traction provided by its all-wheel-drive system, the 3,870-pound Audi A4 is just too portly to keep pace with the C350 in the stoplight grand prix. Acceleration to 60 mph consumes 6.9 seconds (6.6 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the A4 clicks the quarter-mile in 15 seconds flat at 94.7 mph. Audi's 3.2-liter direct-injected V6 is smooth and emits a pleasantly distinctive warble, but it will take more than its 265 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque to out-drag the leaner C350." The major change to the engine for ’09 is the addition of variable valve timing, which adds 11 horsepower and an impressive 51 pound-feet of torque. Although it’s down 54 horsepower to the 3.2-liter V-6, the four-cylinder’s 0-to-60 time of 5.7 seconds was quick enough to match the acceleration of the V-6 version. Even when saddled with the heavy and friction-laden Quattro system and a six-speed automatic, the turbo four-cylinder provides better low-speed acceleration than a V-6 A4 with an automatic and all-wheel drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehsnils Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I might just try it, put it on ebay for a rediculous amount, stating that there are only 86 worldwide, see if i get any responses from rich snobs with too much money and no time to research, it would make my day to sell this thing for 300k Won't stick in Europe - at least not in Scandinavia, here wagons are the norm. And we can get the 3.0 Spec B instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.