tora Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 We had the same car in for a day and did back to back stock pulls, then same car later with a reflash, and then again with UP and DP to give the other customers some idea. Remember this is on a Dyno Dynamics so they read lower than anything else out there. Its good to have more data out there. This car is bone stock but with 18" OZs, vs. bone stock w 18" OZs /w just reflash. blue line is stock, red is just flash let me know if you want more http://www.rocketrally.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skillz Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 The graph is a little hard to read. Can you post your results? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tora Posted December 1, 2005 Author Share Posted December 1, 2005 Did you try maximizing the pic? It looks pretty big and clear when I do it. What info did you want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWDxBOOST Posted December 1, 2005 Share Posted December 1, 2005 numbers definately are on the low side so this is basically stock vs. stage II i only see 2 different plots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthedeck Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 I think it's stock versus just a flash...not stage II. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkiDaddy Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 Who's reflash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodan Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 These numbers are typical for a Legacy GT on Dyno Dynamics. They're about the lowest reading dyno out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkiDaddy Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 Yes, but was this a COBB ECU reflash or someone else's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tora Posted December 2, 2005 Author Share Posted December 2, 2005 The plots are for a STOCK LGT compared with a STOCK LGT WITH Rocket Rally reflash. These are UNCORRECTED numbers for sea level with cool air temps. This car has NO power mods done at all asides from just the flash. Dyno Dynamics numbers do read very realistic (also known as LOW if compared to other dyno's). You are seeing gains with just a flash of 30WHP and arounf 37WTQ. These are not high and low number either. The stock numbers are in the top end of our average initial runs and the flashed example is an average pull. These gains are in the 20% and 25% area over stock with just a flash (TQ and HP respectively). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkiDaddy Posted December 3, 2005 Share Posted December 3, 2005 OK, I see now. What does $949 Canadian translate to in US Dollars? And how would their map run on an LGT used in hot central Florida on 93 octane pump gas? Is it compatible with pulling a trailer on a stick shift car? In deep sand at low speed as well as at 80 PMH for hours at a time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tora Posted December 16, 2005 Author Share Posted December 16, 2005 OK, I see now. What does $949 Canadian translate to in US Dollars? And how would their map run on an LGT used in hot central Florida on 93 octane pump gas? Is it compatible with pulling a trailer on a stick shift car? In deep sand at low speed as well as at 80 PMH for hours at a time? Right now $949 CAD is about $820 USD. Your circumstance sounds extremely unique and I can't say we tune the map for those particular circumstances (does anyone?). Anyways, if you' dlike to test those circumstances out for us we'd be more than happy to send you a MAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkiDaddy Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 I do that now with my Maxima (well not too deep in the sand), but of course it's not a turbo car. I even run at 80 with the car fully loaded & pulling the ski at 80. Yes, I drive carefully and maintain long, safe distances between cars. Your maps retain the knock sensor(s) right? If so, I would be willing to test it for you at no charge once she's got at least 6 months on her. Gotta break 'er in properly first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleBlueGT Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 OK, I see now. What does $949 Canadian translate to in US Dollars? And how would their map run on an LGT used in hot central Florida on 93 octane pump gas? Is it compatible with pulling a trailer on a stick shift car? In deep sand at low speed as well as at 80 PMH for hours at a time? Except for the sand thing I don`t think that is extreme. I drive in hot weather, 80+ mph fully loaded (sometimes with trailer). Full tune of 68HTA, KSTech 73 MAF, Racer X FMIC and ID1000s................by the DataLog Mafia!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkiDaddy Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 My hot weather in central Florida may be a little hotter tan yours in Winnipeg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleBlueGT Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 My hot weather in central Florida may be a little hotter tan yours in Winnipeg. Likely, most of the time. I have seen 110 here one year. Full tune of 68HTA, KSTech 73 MAF, Racer X FMIC and ID1000s................by the DataLog Mafia!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Jedimaster* Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 Rocket Rally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tora Posted December 30, 2005 Author Share Posted December 30, 2005 Rocket Rally? Not sure I find the humour in that... SkiDaddy, sorry but no freebies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.