lookslikeanevo

sorry but i have to disagree... each camera has its own characteristics, each brand does too, similar to film, some only shot fuji, and some kodak etc... each one has different characteristics that play to the end user... Lens collection argument theory..whatever it is ...is blah... and again it re-circles around what i said above. btw...nikon designed their current sensor...sony mass produces it... bu there is still quite a difference in output pic. I also agree with ben, with 6mp someitmes not being enough, especially being that none of the newer cams that are worthwhile come in a 6mp model...

would have been my guess...too long of an exposure

^with photoshop and contrast and saturation correction (and a little cropping) some of those pics would have been golden,

possibly it uses a rear element filter..similar to the fisheye

its called monoprice.com ..lol if you want monster then i get them 40% off

^its a great walk around...extremely versatile... i want the 14-24 f2.8 mmmm or a canon 85 f1.2 with a 5dmkii

nikon 50 1.8 is ~120 buy the body only and a 50...and then buy my 18-200VR for $450

damn merv...your ballin mang from a wedding i shot at the CBS studios http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9231/rxandxochswedding533664rc7.jpg http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/rxandxochswedding533664rc7.jpg/1/w319.png

the tammy 17-50 2.8 is a sharp lens, a little on the noisy side(focusing)...but sharp

psssh canon guys (alhtough i am thinking about jumping ship lol) right now nikon d300 gripped sb800 speedlight 18-200 walkarounf 70-200 nikkor 50 1.8 strobo flash bracket nikon sc18 flash sync cord thinknig of going 5d or 5dmkII or d700, cus im bored lol

70-300is canon lens is a POS save your money for the 70-200f4L non IS or a llittle more for the IS

dman isnt it hard to find the 1.4 with canon?

night pics ftmfw

flash it too direct...gotta bounce it...

lol my girl has the same exact case... how do you like the iphone so far? i like it, except i keep crashing it when i mod it

why do you have a pink iphone?lolz http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5480/rjb49032600ni7.jpg

i was always taught, furthest to closest to the master cylinder...

the tammy 17-50 2.8 has gotten has great reviews from a lot of people, a little loud for my taste, but it definately has crossed my mind a few times

i love 50's everyone needs one in their bag!

true... but again digitally it doesnt really matter...well i guess is PS since going back deletes everything you did, easier fix in lightroom I still crop first

cs3 did not have 64bit support, with 64bit being basically standard now...64bit support was needed

LR2.1 i just go form top to bottom... damn that put crop first

^I know...you're wrong im right ..lol j/k i u who what if your subject is only a part of the picture then what? you adjust lighting/exposure for the whole pic but your subject is either washed out or too dark? then what? crop then readjust? not everything is shot in hdr, or should be

^ i didnt watch any youtube video's...all self taught son...get it right from the film days/and real dark room situations, you determine crop then do burning and dodging as needed...

^excuses