TRSCobra Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Tim Bailey at Surgeline Tuning just tuned my leggy and I'm really impressed with my numbers! 280 whp, 318 wtq http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a204/TRSCobra/18psi92dyno.jpg Mods: Cobb AP v2 Cobb SF Intake w/box Cobb catted DP TurboXS UP HKS cat-back Perrin TMIC And on the way home, I averaged 28.5 mpg from portland to Ft. Lewis! Proof: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a204/TRSCobra/IMG_0556.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wungun1 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Awesome! I need to get a tune. Did you notice a difference (butt-dyno) after the tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
05LegacyGTLimited Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Awesome numbers! I hoping that I get around the same number! Just waiting for the 2009 maps to become available! my baseline runs where 230whp and 291lbs torque! hows it pull? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 I really haven't driven it too hard, since I wanted to check my fuel mileage on the trip back. But the few times I did get on it, I did notice a large mid-range improvement. The car seems to drive a bit smoother, too, as it's not leaning out and pulling timing from 3-4k rpm like it was before the tune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 my baseline runs where 230whp and 291lbs torque! Completely stock?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max713 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Awesome, this is exactly what I want to see, the exact plans I have for my lgt, and my exact goals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
05LegacyGTLimited Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Completely stock?! No LOL that would be awesome Cobb catted DP I have an 09 so no cat in my UP SPT intake (I know I know... But Matt at DSG says he can get a good tune for it!) AVO TMIC Rallitek STG II SPT CBE coming soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vodoo-chile Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I'm curious to what map you were running prior to the tune andhow it compares to that. Were you running an OTS map or from completely stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 The baseline run was on the OTS Cobb stage 2 91 octane map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 Just put a vid up! [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7sNUPHWi8w]YouTube - Legacy GT Dyno Run[/ame] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vodoo-chile Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Do you know what you ots baseline run were at prior to the tune? Kyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEE-OTTO Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Just put a vid up! \ nice looking car and nice numbers to go along with them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 Do you know what you ots baseline run were at prior to the tune? Kyle Look at run 1 on the dyno sheet. 276whp/313wtq <-not much of a difference in peak numbers, but my curves are much nicer now. With the OTS map, the ecm pulled timing immediately after the torque peaked at 3k rpm due to a lean AFR. Also, look at the difference in AFR's between runs 1 and 2. I was running way lean, probably due to the cobb intake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rexster Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Looks like you have strong car. you're making similar whp to a VF52 WRX on that dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Looks like you have strong car. you're making similar whp to a VF52 WRX on that dyno. Tim showed me an overlay of a stage 2 vf52 wrx with the stock cat back and the dyno graphs were almost identical. I'm happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
05LegacyGTLimited Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I am sad I talked to DSG today, and there is no word on the release for the 2009 MY maps I want to get my car tuned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Wow! Hmm..OP's car is running almost 30HP and TQ higher than comparable Stage 2s right? Can that all be attributed to the intake? I thought the turbine was the limiting factor... With those numbers, VF52 upgrades may be moot (at least with stock fueling)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireB Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 What is your AFR on that dyno run? I can kinda see it but wanna see if I am seeing the right number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 The bottom lines in black represent AFR. Minimum went from 11.8 to 11.2 after tune, while max started at 15.3 and tuned to 16.2. Average was 12.4 baseline, 11.8 tuned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Wow! Hmm..OP's car is running almost 30HP and TQ higher than comparable Stage 2s right? Can that all be attributed to the intake? I thought the turbine was the limiting factor... With those numbers, VF52 upgrades may be moot (at least with stock fueling)... I was expecting numbers around 250whp and 290wtq after the tune. Imagine my surprise to get 280/318; on a mustang dyno, nonetheless! I was considering going with a vf52 as a temporary upgrade, but after seeing the only slight differences in output, I'm going to wait and get an AVO 380. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 TRSCobra, do you (or Tim Baily) get the impression that your car is "special" or that similar results can be obtained using your setup (or similar)? Your setup only adds the intake and TMIC to a conventional Stg 2 and a protune...no other magic boxes right? Was it like freezing outside when you did the tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireB Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Interesting, thanks for your info! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 TRSCobra, do you (or Tim Baily) get the impression that your car is "special" or that similar results can be obtained using your setup (or similar)? Your setup only adds the intake and TMIC to a conventional Stg 2 and a protune...no other magic boxes right? Was it like freezing outside when you did the tune? He never mentioned that mine was a factory freak or anything. No other magic boxes were used. I did, however do a few things to make sure my car was running right before I went down there; changed the plugs to 1 step colder (NGK LFR7AIX), changed the oil (Castrol syntec) and the trans/rear diff fluids (Subaru Extra-S), and cleaned the MAF sensor (CRC MAF sensor cleaner spray). Tim checked the calibration of his dyno since my numbers were a bit high, and it was reading correctly. FWIW, one guy who worked there said stock STI's dyno 230-240 whp on that particulat dyno. EDIT: It was 53-55 degrees that day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommy72ca Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I'm wondering what type of fuel you are using for the run? That's some awesome output on the Mustang Dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRSCobra Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Washington Chevron 92 octane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.