NSFW Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Under what conditions does the ECU use values from A vs. B?
Deer Killer Posted March 6, 2008 Author Posted March 6, 2008 Only information I could find on it http://www.legacygt.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1555282&postcount=30 My only thought is that might be addition knock protection in the most knock prone area, but with the cap of 2.8 load, it's just useless.
LittleBlueGT Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 I dropped mine to all 0s. In many of my logs you could see at switch from on to off (obvious by a sudden drop of 3 degress in timing) and it was annoying. MickeyD2005 can tell you more I am sure. Full tune of 68HTA, KSTech 73 MAF, Racer X FMIC and ID1000s................by the DataLog Mafia!!!
Deer Killer Posted March 6, 2008 Author Posted March 6, 2008 Are those numbers exact? Because as I compare maps, I see that people interpolate over the timing without regard to this 3 degrees.
LittleBlueGT Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Are those numbers exact? Because as I compare maps, I see that people interpolate over the timing without regard to this 3 degrees. I don't understand what you mean by "exact". Full tune of 68HTA, KSTech 73 MAF, Racer X FMIC and ID1000s................by the DataLog Mafia!!!
NSFW Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Only information I could find on it http://www.legacygt.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1555282&postcount=30 My only thought is that might be addition knock protection in the most knock prone area, but with the cap of 2.8 load, it's just useless. Interesting, thanks for the link.
Deer Killer Posted March 6, 2008 Author Posted March 6, 2008 I don't understand what you mean by "exact". 2000-3500rpms, 2.0-2.8 load
2005garnetGT Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 so, basically if a 5EAT is lugging it in 5th? I need to look into this sawtooth timing effect more, I think I've experienced it when I had to use 91 octane gas
Deer Killer Posted March 6, 2008 Author Posted March 6, 2008 stock cars are in that region all the time, 2000+ rpms is _not_ lugging. It makes sense for additional knock protection stock since you won't really go over a 2.5 load. But stage 2+, you've easily exceeded 2.8, so what's the point, other than really rough running at part throttle? Might as well go much easier on the timing. My theory is that the table is flat because there is no post-TMIC temp sensor. If there was, that table would index again TMIC outlet temp. IMHO.
LittleBlueGT Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 My theory is that the table is flat because there is no post-TMIC temp sensor. If there was, that table would index again TMIC outlet temp. IMHO. I actually agree with your theory. Full tune of 68HTA, KSTech 73 MAF, Racer X FMIC and ID1000s................by the DataLog Mafia!!!
2005garnetGT Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 thats where I get the rough running, from around 40%-70% throttle.. usually I just goose it to get the trans to kick down so I'm not in that speed/load range.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.