Bbc84 Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 08' LGT 5MT Mods: Stock 222WHP/251WTQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyan Posted July 20, 2008 Author Share Posted July 20, 2008 Is that tuned or stock without a tune? SoCal Duck Hunters Club - Unit 52 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbc84 Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 Is that tuned or stock without a tune? OEM Stock w/o tune. Had about 5k miles on the car when I took it into dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hops Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 Nice to see a completely stock dyno compared to the rest of these... Buy my cars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmp Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 However, when at home, boosting 21 psi (no awd dyno here) running 12.86-12.96. E/T's aren't good indicators of Power - what were your trap speeds? SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitual Line Stepper Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 08' LGT 5MT Mods: Stock 222WHP/251WTQ Anybody else think this is a rather high reading dyno? "I for one do not doubt you, dude. Your car is fast and an internet legend." -Gire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmp Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Anybody else think this is a rather high reading dyno? Righto - every dyno is absolutely set up differently, and likely measures differently. Without the context of 'what other stock cars' run on that dyno it's only 'entertainment'. Anothing thing to keep in mind - 'smoothing'. that dyno curve wasn't 'smoothed'. Non-smoothed dyno's jump around like that and can show higher-than-real numbers as a little peak touches a higher point on the scale. If that were smoothed to some degree, I bet it'd be 5?10? hp (peak) lower. Or, his car is a ringer. Now...if it were a spec.B... SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 I think it's consistent with other 08 whp readings. Maybe touch high, but not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitual Line Stepper Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 (edited) 2007 5eat Specifications: Eng Torque T WC (Ft-Lb): 245 Eng Power T WC (HP): 232 AFR (Ratio): 16.2 -15 to +45 (PSI) 17.5K&N Typhoon Cold Air IntakeCobb V.2 AccessportSurgeline protune by Tim BaileyX02 Racing Catless DownpipeX02 Racing Catback ExhaustIPT Valve Body Edited July 23, 2008 by Habitual Line Stepper "I for one do not doubt you, dude. Your car is fast and an internet legend." -Gire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbc84 Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Righto - every dyno is absolutely set up differently, and likely measures differently. Without the context of 'what other stock cars' run on that dyno it's only 'entertainment'. Anothing thing to keep in mind - 'smoothing'. that dyno curve wasn't 'smoothed'. Non-smoothed dyno's jump around like that and can show higher-than-real numbers as a little peak touches a higher point on the scale. If that were smoothed to some degree, I bet it'd be 5?10? hp (peak) lower. Or, his car is a ringer. Now...if it were a spec.B... Only other stock car I can compare with on that same dyno is my friends 07' G35x. His car had about same mileage and he went 1 weekend after me. he has the new VQ HR I think 306HP 268TQ to the fly. He dynoed in about 230whp and 200wtq on the same dyno as I did my pulls. Thats the only comparison I have with a stock car. I hope I have a factory freak, cuz my last car was a factory dud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous1 Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 Only other stock car I can compare with on that same dyno is my friends 07' G35x. His car had about same mileage and he went 1 weekend after me. he has the new VQ HR I think 306HP 268TQ to the fly. He dynoed in about 230whp and 200wtq on the same dyno as I did my pulls. Thats the only comparison I have with a stock car. I hope I have a factory freak, cuz my last car was a factory dud How does your car compare to your friend's, those HR's run pretty strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbc84 Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 How does your car compare to your friend's, those HR's run pretty strong. See 10 posts above yours, I posted dyno chart up there. Same dyno: 222whp/251wtq - Stock 08' 5MT LGT 5k miles ~230whp/200wtq - Stock 07' Automatic G35X 5k miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous1 Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 See 10 posts above yours, I posted dyno chart up there. Same dyno: 222whp/251wtq - Stock 08' 5MT LGT 5k miles ~230whp/200wtq - Stock 07' Automatic G35X 5k miles. LOL I see that, I mean on the street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Living Legacy Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 (edited) 08' LGT 5MT Mods: Stock 222WHP/251WTQ Anyone else notice the CF: SAE??? I noticed on some other dynos that people had no CF's...I have no idea what role that plays. He must have one of those hand built cherry picked motors. My friend had his EVO IX MR with FMIC RAM air intake, Boost controller (21.6 PSI), TBE (high flow cat), and tunned that put down 325 and 316... Edited July 30, 2008 by Living Legacy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goucho Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Anyone else notice the CF: SAE??? I noticed on some other dynos that people had no CF's...I have no idea what role that plays. My friend had his EVO IX MR with FMIC RAM air intake, Boost controller (21.6 PSI), TBE (high flow cat), and tunned that put down 325 and 316... The SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) Correction Factor considers a standard of 77°F (25°C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.234 in-Hg (99 KPa) [sAE J1349]. This is a factor of 1.04. So on a hotter/humid day the correction factor would drop according to the following equation: http://www.land-and-sea.com/images/dyno/tech%20talk/SAE_J1349_formula.gif cfis the final correction factor multiplier Pd is the pressure of dry air in hPa (990 hPA = 99 kPa) Tc is the air's temperature in degrees Celsius Most tuners use this SAE correction factor to avoid differences in weather related conditions. It is also important to note that AMS uses a DYNOJET dyno that tends to read on the slightly higher side as opposed to the MUSTANG dyno that reads on the slightly lower side. Here is my Dyno from AMS with the mods described above by Living Legacy. Hope this helps clear anything up! http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g209/imag33/BenEgan-93oct-stockturbo.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmp Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Frankly, Corrected Dyno measurements are worthless. I don't care about what my car 'theoretically' would produce on a standard day - I want to know what my car DID produce THAT day. Especially for Turbo/SC cars? Leave Correction OFF. SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbc84 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 He must have one of those hand built cherry picked motors. I can has a Spec B motor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goucho Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 Frankly, Corrected Dyno measurements are worthless. I don't care about what my car 'theoretically' would produce on a standard day - I want to know what my car DID produce THAT day. Especially for Turbo/SC cars? Leave Correction OFF. I understand where you're coming from... But I think you might think differently when you get your car dyno'd on a VERY hot & Humid day, and it reads like 40 whp lower than everyone else. I think the CF should be used in order to COMPARE dyno's, as it makes things more standard. I am neither FOR nor AGAINST using it (although I'm glad they did use it cause it was an extremely hot and humid day ). Just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmp Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 I understand where you're coming from... But I think you might think differently when you get your car dyno'd on a VERY hot & Humid day, and it reads like 40 whp lower than everyone else. I think the CF should be used in order to COMPARE dyno's, as it makes things more standard. I am neither FOR nor AGAINST using it (although I'm glad they did use it cause it was an extremely hot and humid day ). Just my opinion I dunno, ya know. I think I'd still be more interested in the power actually put down - not a guess as to what it 'could' have made under ideal situation. I mean, I don't know too many folk who'd want the corrected number if they dyno'd on a VERY cool day (20 degrees) and high Baro pressure, etc. I dyno'd my rx8 saturday - was 95 degrees. Car made 173whp. Some sorta Dynacomp? or something? dyno...it's made close to 200 before. In January. 40 degrees, etc. SOLD | '06 spec.B - VF52/AVO/740cc/Up/Down | 238awhp | 50-80mph 3.1 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derffred Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 (edited) Just got my dyno tune at Precision Tuning here in NJ [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbwXtSBoLB4]YouTube - 2005 Subaru LegacyGT dyno'd at Precision Tuning[/ame] 2005 ABP LGT 5MT Perrin TMIC and Recirc. BOV AVO Panel Filter Crucial Racing UP, DP, & RP (catless) Magnaflow Catback. Everything else is stock It's tuned to about 17.5psi (their sensor reads 1.5psi high) And they put my graph up compared to a Stock 08 STi. Edited October 5, 2008 by derffred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VTGT Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 ^Nice what setup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rc0032 Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 (their sensor reads 1.5psi high) details on how this is possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derffred Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 lol I didn't ask questions about that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derffred Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Woo! The video finally works lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spec B Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 ^ WOW... Congrats man...the numbers are sick! Maybe I should go for a FMIC tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now