gianspi Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 90lbs?? hahah enough zip ties and duct tape will fix anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianspi Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 I still vote for SZ49..performance aside, its still got a cool name and free rebuilds for life. enough zip ties and duct tape will fix anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rc0032 Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 i understand what your saying and im actually quite impressed. m5's are pretty damn quick . Fixed A tdo6 20g with meth will get you the 350 you are looking for . No it wont I really don't understand why anyone would put in a turbo that is smaller than 90 lbs or so and 4 more cylinders :lol: I still vote for SZ49..performance aside, its still got a cool name and free rebuilds for life. Quote of the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexylegacy Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 I always liked the "Disco Potato" turbo myself. That was the turbo of choice for re-boosting an SR20DET. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 Stock clutch can handle a 20g HA, HA, HA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 I know a guy with an 18g running a FMIC and alky on a WRX and made 375hp. Ran an 11.7 in the 1/4, Kachow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groff Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 wrx = 2.0L LGT = 2.5L "what?" now beotch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2005garnetGT Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 it could have been an 06 or 07 wrx which=2.5L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rc0032 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Them there numbers are still a lot high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2005garnetGT Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 yeah, cuz I know a guy running a vf40 making 321whp and 333ftlbs who ran a 10.98@129mph cuz he believed in the flying spaghetti monster and FSM was his copilot. duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rc0032 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Was is a moded VF40? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2005garnetGT Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 it was touched by a divine noodly appendage, it was. thats like being modded, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 If you can get 375whp with a 2.0, then you should be able to get atleast that much with a 2.5, thats what I was saying. If you put an 18g, fmic, and alky on a LGT you should be even faster. There is also another thread on LGT of an STI with a vf 39 and alky making like 360 or 370 hp. And I know Buschur Racing has gotten I think like mid 300hp from a vf 39. I just looked, it wasnt that much it was just a little over 300hp, but over 370lbft of torque. ha, I misread a lot of stuff apparently. I was reading torque and not hp. tq and hp for both of the cars in that last paragraph was like 305hp, and 370 tq. my bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rc0032 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 If you can get 375whp with a 2.0, then you should be able to get atleast that much with a 2.5, thats what I was saying. If you put an 18g, fmic, and alky on a LGT you should be even faster. There is also another thread on LGT of an STI with a vf 39 and alky making like 360 or 370 hp. And I know Buschur Racing has gotten I think like mid 300hp from a vf 39. I just looked, it wasnt that much it was just a little over 300hp, but over 370lbft of torque. Link us dyno plots because these numbers are very nigh... a LGT with an 18g and FMIC will make around 300 no way a 2.0l WFX is making 375 WHP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 If I can find a dynochart, or the guy that has the 18g WRX I will get more info for you. He was a friend of mine when I lived in SC. But unfortunately I dont live there anymore.. but I will look for info. His car was actually in one of the import magazines, it might have even been Subiesport. I think I have the magazine at home somewhere, I will look for that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Link us dyno plots because these numbers are very nigh... a LGT with an 18g and FMIC will make around 300 no way a 2.0l WFX is making 375 WHP 375whp is a bit high for a 2.0L with an 18g but it does seem borderline achievable since one of my friends got this from his 2.0L WRX wagon with an 18g on pump CA91 + meth: http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d14/BiggSean/tunes/pumpvmeth.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Thanks Boostjunkie, appreciate the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Well, I havent got his dyno but here is a post from Nasioc: Bone stock tranny and EJ205, Deadbolt td05h 18g 7cm, Perrin FMIC, 820cc injectors, SMC 100% meth injection, custom puck clutch, Walbro, and other supporting mods ----> 11.7 @ 122 mph I believe he has the record for the fastest WRX with the stock block, or atleast he used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous1 Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 375whp is a bit high for a 2.0L with an 18g but it does seem borderline achievable since one of my friends got this from his 2.0L WRX wagon with an 18g on pump CA91 + meth: http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d14/BiggSean/tunes/pumpvmeth.jpg Didn't Merv put down something in the neighborhood of 335whp w/Perrin TMIC and few other bolt ons with his 18g also? I would imagine with meth and FMIC he would come very close to 375whp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutter2k Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 18g really matches the 2.0 power band pretty well. Its not a bad turbo for a 2.5, but in the upper rpms, it can't supply enough air for the 2.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 Didn't Merv put down something in the neighborhood of 335whp w/Perrin TMIC and few other bolt ons with his 18g also? I would imagine with meth and FMIC he would come very close to 375whp. A bit less than that. I think just over 300whp, but I think there was definitely more left in his setup. That all won't matter soon enough since he's got some significant upgrades in the pipeline An 18g will be very hard pressed to hit 375whp as that will be pushing it right to the edge of the compressor map. You'd need race gas (or good pump gas and meth) and an aggressive tune to get there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostjunkie Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 18g really matches the 2.0 power band pretty well. Its not a bad turbo for a 2.5, but in the upper rpms, it can't supply enough air for the 2.5. The 18g is pretty much perfect for the 2.0L. It's not bad on the 2.5L, but I always recommend at least a 20g for people upgrading the turbo on a 2.5L. Really, I like something in the FP Green/SZ49 size class on a daily driven street 2.5L. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous1 Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 Really, I like something in the FP Green/SZ49 size class on a daily driven street 2.5L. +1 That is my plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rao Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 49 lbs/min is waaaaay too small for a 2.5 liter motor; you need something in the 70-80 range Rob IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR CAR YOU SHOULD NEVER DRIVE IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wukindada Posted September 20, 2007 Share Posted September 20, 2007 True..... Lag would def. be a non-factor on 60lb+ turbos SZ49 with supporting mods incl. meth makes for a very good DD setup. Lag is not all that bad, with a great tune peak TQ can be had around 3900-4000 Toyota 6EATS .........SUCK!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.