godwhomismike Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 I dont get it. 2.0 turbocharged 4cyl engine that will only put out 140hp for the export market? How in the heck is that supposed to sell? Especially in a car that big. It's a turbodiesel and probably will make sometime like 250 lb ft of torque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperhawkLGT Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 looks like a saturn and a caliber Exactly what I was going to say. Ion baned a Caliber. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melayout Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Repulsive....think a Mini 300C with an Ion backend and a Pacifica front end. I keed I keeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.T.Subie Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Ugly POS Denial is your best friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legandrex Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 My mom's old Lebaron GTS Turbo was better looking than that piece o crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fzanetti Posted June 25, 2006 Author Share Posted June 25, 2006 I dont get it. 2.0 turbocharged 4cyl engine that will only put out 140hp for the export market? How in the heck is that supposed to sell? Especially in a car that big. Diesel!!!!!!!!!!!! Prob 250 lbft torque!!!! Heheheheheeh Flavio Zanetti Boston, MA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sponge Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 UGLY...what a weird roof line! It is a mismatch of a few different DCX cars and I just don't get it? MAN IS IT UGLY! My vB Gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegacyMUN2k6 Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Kinda looks like a benz and a sebring gave birth to a hybird child. I like it, i'd buy an american car one day. Ours are close anuff granted they were manudactured here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyzard Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Holy crap that is ugly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iyalla Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Antilock brakes standard? No way! LOL:lol: My thoughts exactly! And OMG say it isn't so but SIDE CURTAIN AIR BAGS too.....**FAINT** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f1anatic Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 garbage - sorry no difference to dodge caliber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy BoB Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 4 door? does this mean its no longer going to be a convertible? Isn't the only reason the sebring has sold as many cars as it had been the fact that it was a convertible? Has chrysler forgetten that the only reason they survived the 80's was because of the Caravan and the Lebaron convertible. Looks like I continue hanging on to my 94 Lebaron convertible. BTW it looks like a bloated Crossfire, a car I never really cared for to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konrad Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 looks like Saturn. crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raz-0 Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 is it just me or does this look like a bigger saturn ion? It's not jsut you. I think it looks like a saturn with crossfire looking dents in the sheetmetal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoxerGT2.5 Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Def. better than before but......first thing I think of "Rental Car".... Well then they nailed their target demographic! You couldn't pay me enough to own a Chrysler. OBAMA......One Big Ass Mistake America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underdog Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Looks like I continue hanging on to my 94 Lebaron convertible. I've gotta a '95... we should start a LeBaron owners sub-group! The Crimson Dynamo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f1anatic Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Well then they nailed their target demographic! You couldn't pay me enough to own a Chrysler. SRT-8 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy BoB Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Underdog, We have the best years for the Lebaron anyway. I remember reading an article about the 94 Lebaron after I had bought it, basically it talked about the Chrysler\massareatti TC, a car the 2 complanies built together and neither could market(Had manufacturing problems in europe so it came out 9 monthes late, and in the US it was to similiar to the Lebaron of the time for people to pay the extra cash). So they discontinued it in 93 and basically stuck a back seat in it and turned it into the 94-95 Lebaron. Then they replace it with the underpowered and weird looking sebring. If I remeber they sold both in 95 and the Lebaron outsold the sebring hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fzanetti Posted June 27, 2006 Author Share Posted June 27, 2006 Underdog, We have the best years for the Lebaron anyway. I remember reading an article about the 94 Lebaron after I had bought it, basically it talked about the Chrysler\massareatti TC, a car the 2 complanies built together and neither could market(Had manufacturing problems in europe so it came out 9 monthes late, and in the US it was to similiar to the Lebaron of the time for people to pay the extra cash). So they discontinued it in 93 and basically stuck a back seat in it and turned it into the 94-95 Lebaron. Then they replace it with the underpowered and weird looking sebring. If I remeber they sold both in 95 and the Lebaron outsold the sebring hands down. Turbo? Flavio Zanetti Boston, MA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy BoB Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Sadly no, the dumped the turbo and only offered the 3.0L V6 which was actually not a bad engine. Built by Mitsubishi, and is the same engine that they offered in the low end 3000GT. While HP seemed low it had lots of Torque which actually made it perform better than what most people thought it would do when looking at the numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psucaptainkickass Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 I would really like to meet who designed this car. And poop on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The B4 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Saturn Ion FTL! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanger Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 a bit of E class looking to me... ○ ○ ○ Instagram: itshangertime :spin: ○ ○ ○ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.