Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

2017 LegacyGT.com Calendar


ChrisCrash

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 263
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 vote per person. That way you pic only one pic of the 400 you posted. Magno. Lol.

I had 2 in the calendar last year :hide:

reading is hard.

I couldn't imagine being reading impaired. It'd make daily tasks so much more difficult.

2005 Vader Wagon

Material Tests on Ringland Failure Piston

I should have held off and purchased a wagon instead of the spec.B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

;);):confused::confused::confused::confused:

 

His name is Kevin. He's kind of a big deal

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161203/71433b39d75132ce3e23f8ce8d4b9c57.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

:confused::confused::confused::confused:

What exactly don't you 6th Genners understand about the rules? Get a clue gents, read the rules, and please follow the current happenings of the thread. STOP posting pics.

GTEASER's 2012 Legacy GT - Sold

GTEASER's 2009 XTeaser - Sold

GTEASER's 1992 Legacy SS - Sold

 

Stapp's Law: “The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle.”

 

"Simple incompetence is a far more sinister force in the world than evil intent."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'd rather not see is repeats of cars. I don't particularly care whether it's the same person submitting if the car is different, but I understand how making it limited to 1 picture per person accomplishes pretty much the same thing as there are not a ton of photos where the same person has submitted pictures of different cars.

 

Therefore, I prefer one winner per person/(car). I do feel like allowing the submitter to pick amongst all his submissions circumvents the voting process as it allows a submitter to choose a picture that has less votes than one that has more, but if you are saying that a submitter may only choose from his submissions that have enough votes to get in the calendar, I find that to be a reasonable compromise. At least it ensures that it was a high-vote-count picture.

 

I prefer a strict tally of highest vote counts, with no repeats of cars. I am willing to reasonably accept the other conditions as outlined above if that's the way the wind is blowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^I agree with that. I don't think that the cover or the back cover for that matter is a particularly desirable spot so thats where the second picture of mine ended up last year was the back cover. We have a lot of good looking cars in here but it seems there was less participation this year compared to previous years calendar threads.

2005 Vader Wagon

Material Tests on Ringland Failure Piston

I should have held off and purchased a wagon instead of the spec.B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that. Front and back cover being exempted from the above rules proposals may make some sense. I don't really have a preference for this particular issue though. I do think we do have at least enough good pictures to cover what we need (12 or 14 as the case may be) without repeats. If we got to the point where we didn't have enough some year in the future, we could always revisit this issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use